Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core: update github PR template #2377

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

core: update github PR template #2377

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

lrstewart
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:

s2n-quic version of aws/s2n-tls#4885

Call-outs:

I wasn't sure what testing I could list under "Testing" the way I listed testing requirements for s2n-tls. The unit tests requirement hold true, but I'm not sure about the others. Suggestions? That could also just be a separate PR from someone more familiar with s2n-quic tests.

Testing:

documentation change

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link
Contributor

@WesleyRosenblum WesleyRosenblum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one small nit

We can add additional testing guidelines separately

@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
### Release Summary:
<!-- If this is a feature or bug that impacts customers and is significant enough to include in the "Summary" section of the next version release, please include a brief (1-2 sentences) description of the change. The audience of this summary is future customers, not maintainers or reviewers. See https://github.com/aws/s2n-tls/releases/tag/v1.5.7 for an example. Otherwise, leave this section blank -->
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd probably point this to an s2n-quic example once we have one

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, we just don't have one yet 🙃

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lrstewart lrstewart merged commit 4c3ba69 into main Nov 13, 2024
128 of 129 checks passed
@lrstewart lrstewart deleted the pr_template branch November 13, 2024 00:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants