Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add flakiness check status handling in community solution card and model. #2327

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rohitpaulk
Copy link
Member

@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk commented Oct 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a "Flaky" label for solutions that fail the flakiness check, providing clearer feedback for staff members.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced user experience by ensuring accurate display of solution reliability based on flakiness check status.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new feature that enhances user feedback on community course stage solutions. A conditional rendering block is added to display a "Flaky" label with a tooltip for solutions marked as "failure" when viewed by staff members. Additionally, a new attribute, flakinessCheckStatus, is added to the CommunityCourseStageSolutionModel class to track the status of flakiness checks, allowing for four possible string values.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/components/course-page/course-stage-step/... Introduced a conditional rendering block for staff to show a "Flaky" label with a tooltip if @solution.flakinessCheckStatus is "failure".
app/models/community-course-stage-solution.ts Added flakinessCheckStatus attribute to CommunityCourseStageSolutionModel with values: 'pending', 'success', 'failure', and 'error'.

Poem

In the garden of code, where solutions bloom,
A "Flaky" label now brightens the room.
With status to track, both clear and precise,
Staff members rejoice, oh, what a nice slice!
So hop along, friends, let’s celebrate cheer,
For changes like these bring us all near! 🐇✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Test Results

  1 files  ±0    1 suites  ±0   6m 45s ⏱️ +14s
575 tests ±0  539 ✅ ±0  36 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
590 runs  ±0  554 ✅ ±0  36 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 36f7cb3. ± Comparison against base commit 3ca1349.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/components/course-page/course-stage-step/community-solution-card/header-label.hbs (2)

7-12: Improve indentation and refine the conditional block

The new "Flaky" label feature is a valuable addition, but there are a few minor improvements we can make:

  1. The indentation of the new block is inconsistent with the surrounding code. It should be aligned with the other conditional blocks.

  2. The (and ...) helper might be unnecessary if Handlebars supports direct boolean operations. Consider simplifying if possible.

  3. The tooltip text could be more specific about the nature of the flakiness and its implications.

Here's a suggested revision:

{{else if (eq @solution.flakinessCheckStatus "failure") (current-user-is-staff)}}
  <Pill @color="yellow" ...attributes>
    Flaky
    <EmberTooltip @text="This solution inconsistently passes tests, indicating potential reliability issues. Staff only: consider reviewing or updating this solution." />
  </Pill>

This revision aligns the indentation, potentially simplifies the conditional (if supported by your Handlebars version), and provides a more detailed tooltip explanation.


7-12: Ensure backend support and documentation for flakinessCheckStatus

The introduction of the flakinessCheckStatus with a "failure" state implies changes in the backend or data model. To ensure a complete implementation of this feature:

  1. Verify that the backend supports the new flakinessCheckStatus attribute and can set it to "failure" when appropriate.
  2. Update relevant documentation to explain the flakinessCheckStatus attribute, its possible values, and how it's determined.
  3. Consider adding logging or monitoring for solutions marked as flaky to track the frequency and impact of this status.

To verify the backend implementation, you could run:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for backend implementation of flakinessCheckStatus

# Test: Look for flakinessCheckStatus in model definitions
rg --type ruby 'flakinessCheckStatus' app/models

# Test: Check for flakinessCheckStatus in relevant controllers or services
rg --type ruby 'flakinessCheckStatus' app/controllers app/services

# Test: Search for any existing documentation
rg 'flakinessCheckStatus' docs README.md

This will help ensure that the feature is fully implemented and documented across the system.

app/models/community-course-stage-solution.ts (1)

40-40: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for clarity.

The new flakinessCheckStatus attribute is well-implemented using the @attr decorator and a union type for type safety. This addition aligns with the PR objectives of handling flakiness check status in the community solution model.

Consider adding a brief comment above the attribute to explain its purpose and when it's updated. For example:

// Tracks the status of the flakiness check for this solution.
// Updated after each flakiness check run.
@attr('string') declare flakinessCheckStatus: 'pending' | 'success' | 'failure' | 'error';

This comment would provide context for other developers who might work on this code in the future.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ca1349 and 36f7cb3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/components/course-page/course-stage-step/community-solution-card/header-label.hbs (1 hunks)
  • app/models/community-course-stage-solution.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/components/course-page/course-stage-step/community-solution-card/header-label.hbs (1)

7-12: Verify UI consistency across different scenarios

The addition of the "Flaky" label enhances the information provided to staff members, which is valuable. However, it's important to ensure that this addition doesn't negatively impact the user interface in various scenarios.

Please run the following checks to ensure UI consistency:

  1. Verify that the "Flaky" label doesn't overlap with other labels when multiple conditions are true (e.g., a flaky solution that is also pinned).
  2. Check the appearance of the community solution card when different combinations of labels are present.
  3. Ensure that the addition of this label doesn't cause layout shifts or overflow issues on different screen sizes.

This will help identify any potential conflicts or inconsistencies in the UI that may need to be addressed.

app/models/community-course-stage-solution.ts (1)

40-40: Verify integration with related components

The addition of the flakinessCheckStatus attribute is non-disruptive to the existing code and extends the model's capabilities. However, it's important to ensure that any components or services interacting with this model are updated to handle this new attribute appropriately.

To verify the integration, please run the following script:

Please review the output and ensure that relevant components are updated to handle the new flakinessCheckStatus attribute.

✅ Verification successful

FlakinessCheckStatus Attribute Integrated Correctly

The flakinessCheckStatus attribute is properly integrated with existing components and services. All relevant files have been updated to handle this new attribute appropriately.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of CommunityCourseStageSolutionModel and flakinessCheckStatus

# Search for files that import or use CommunityCourseStageSolutionModel
echo "Files potentially using CommunityCourseStageSolutionModel:"
rg -l "CommunityCourseStageSolutionModel" app

# Search for any existing usage of flakinessCheckStatus
echo "\nExisting usage of flakinessCheckStatus:"
rg "flakinessCheckStatus" app

# Note: If there are no results for flakinessCheckStatus, it might indicate that related components need to be updated to use this new attribute.

Length of output: 2352

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 580 bytes (0.0%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅

Detailed changes
Bundle name Size Change
client-array-push 35.76MB 580 bytes (0.0%) ⬆️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant