feat: add AWS uploading image

[cdrage]

feat: add AWS uploading image

What does this PR do?

• Adds the ability to upload to AWS through build
• Toggled advanced features section

Screenshot / video of UI

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

Closes #487

How to test this PR?

1. Sign up for a free AWS S3 bucket account
2. Set very permissive options for S3 bucket for your user (full admin access) so you do not encounter policy issues for testing.
3. Add your credentials to ~/.aws/credentials
4. Build your image + provide your bucket, aminame, etc.

Signed-off-by: Charlie Drage [email protected]

[cdrage]

Encountered osbuild/bootc-image-builder#501 for use against a custom server, so opened up that issue. It does however work with AWS S3.

Tasks:

• Works with AWS S3
• Add unit tests.

[cdrage]

Ready for review.. although bit of a chicken and an egg problem. We can get this in, but we would need to rebase and update against #540 , or we wait for #540 and then rebase against that.

Totally fine either way, but there are some hardcoded color files in this PR since they do not match the other current ones when using from color-registry.ts

cc @deboer-tim

[deboer-tim]

Ready for review.. although bit of a chicken and an egg problem. We can get this in, but we would need to rebase and update against #540 , or we wait for #540 and then rebase against that.

Did you mean rebasing on #576? (as we don't have any other PRs up in this area that would require rebasing and there are several steps to do #540). I don't have an issue with this from a light mode standpoint, as we could easily replace these color values at the same time as fixing the others and it doesn't make sense to do anything else in the meantime.

[cdrage]

Ready for review.. although bit of a chicken and an egg problem. We can get this in, but we would need to rebase and update against #540 , or we wait for #540 and then rebase against that.

Did you mean rebasing on #576? (as we don't have any other PRs up in this area that would require rebasing and there are several steps to do #540). I don't have an issue with this from a light mode standpoint, as we could easily replace these color values at the same time as fixing the others and it doesn't make sense to do anything else in the meantime.

Ah I mean if we should wait for light mode form to go in first before this PR. If you are good with hardcoded colours (for now), I'm fine with that!

👍