Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(test): updates a couple tests to disregard list order #11840

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rtekal
Copy link
Contributor

@rtekal rtekal commented Nov 12, 2024

In our fork, we have a different number of EntityTypes. It seems that because of this difference, when CollectionUtils.intersect was called in SearchUtils, the resulting list had a different order compared to upstream when running the test. In this PR I have updated the tests that were affected by this to disregard the order of the list and only check that it has the correct contents.

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions github-actions bot added product PR or Issue related to the DataHub UI/UX community-contribution PR or Issue raised by member(s) of DataHub Community datahub-community-champion PRs authored by DataHub Community Champions labels Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community-contribution PR or Issue raised by member(s) of DataHub Community datahub-community-champion PRs authored by DataHub Community Champions product PR or Issue related to the DataHub UI/UX
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants