Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support opaque records #908

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

Support opaque records #908

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2023

Conversation

badcel
Copy link
Member

@badcel badcel commented Jul 26, 2023

  • I agree that my contribution may be licensed either under MIT or any version of LGPL license.

Part of #622

Tests:

  • method with opaque instance parameter (transfer full)
  • method with opaque instance parameter (transfer none)
  • Method with opaque parameter array (with length parameter)
  • Method with nullable opaque parameter array (with length parameter)
  • Method with opaque parameter (transfer full)
  • Method with opaque parameter (transfer none)
  • Method with opaque return value (transfer full)
  • Method with opaque return value (transfer none)
  • Method with nullable opaque parameter (transfer full)
  • Method with nullable opaque parameter (transfer none)
  • Method with nullable opaque return value (transfer full)
  • Method with nullable opaque return value (transfer none)
  • Callback with opaque parameter (transfer full)
  • Callback with opaque parameter (transfer none)
  • Callback with nullable opaque parameter (transfer full)
  • Callback with nullable opaque parameter (transfer none)
  • Callback with opaque return value (transfer full)
  • Callback with opaque return value (transfer none)
  • Callback with nullable opaque return value (transfer full)
  • Callback with nullable opaque return value (transfer none)

@badcel badcel force-pushed the support-opaque-records branch 6 times, most recently from d6f6cc6 to ec2a6a8 Compare July 29, 2023 19:35
@badcel badcel mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2023
13 tasks
@badcel badcel force-pushed the support-opaque-records branch 12 times, most recently from 41c13f8 to f0a9301 Compare August 6, 2023 11:46
@badcel badcel force-pushed the support-opaque-records branch 7 times, most recently from 8725235 to 9f002de Compare August 16, 2023 19:13
@badcel badcel force-pushed the support-opaque-records branch 4 times, most recently from 99f7233 to 8789d26 Compare August 22, 2023 12:48
@badcel badcel force-pushed the support-opaque-records branch 17 times, most recently from 984a49b to 9e4b282 Compare August 30, 2023 10:00
@badcel badcel force-pushed the support-opaque-records branch 3 times, most recently from 308d1f6 to d27b3f8 Compare August 31, 2023 10:26
@badcel badcel marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2023 10:39
@badcel badcel merged commit f3ed302 into main Sep 1, 2023
3 checks passed
@badcel badcel deleted the support-opaque-records branch September 1, 2023 09:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant