Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GHSA-9gqr-xp86-f87h] Code injection in npm git #4980

Closed

Conversation

akaday
Copy link

@akaday akaday commented Nov 4, 2024

Updates

  • Affected products
  • Description

Comments
identifying and addressing common security weaknesses, specifically focusing on OS Command Injection (CWE-78) and Code Injection (CWE-94). These are important areas to address in any codebase to ensure the security and integrity of your applications.

Addressing Common Weaknesses:
Here are some steps you can take to mitigate these vulnerabilities:

OS Command Injection (CWE-78):
Definition: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command.

Description: This weakness occurs when special characters that are part of user inputs are not properly neutralized, allowing attackers to manipulate OS commands.

Prevention:

Input Validation: Validate and sanitize all user inputs.

Use Safe APIs: Utilize APIs that do not allow direct command execution.

Escape Special Characters: Properly escape any special characters in inputs.

Example:

javascript
const { execFile } = require('child_process');

function runCommand(userInput) {
// Validate and sanitize user input
const sanitizedInput = sanitize(userInput);
execFile('somecommand', [sanitizedInput], (error, stdout, stderr) => {
if (error) {
console.error(Error: ${error.message});
}
console.log(Output: ${stdout});
});
}

function sanitize(input) {
// Implement your sanitization logic
return input.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/g, '');
}
Code Injection (CWE-94):
Definition: Improper Control of Generation of Code.

Description: This weakness occurs when untrusted inputs are used in code generation, leading to potential code execution by attackers.

Prevention:

Avoid Dynamic Code Execution: Avoid using functions like eval that execute code dynamically.

Sanitize Inputs: Ensure all inputs used in code generation are sanitized.

Use Static Analysis Tools: Utilize tools to detect potential code injection points in your codebase.

Example:

javascript
function safeFunction(userInput) {
// Avoid using eval or similar functions
const safeCode = console.log("User input: ${sanitize(userInput)}");
console.log(safeCode);
}

function sanitize(input) {
// Implement your sanitization logic
return input.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/g, '');
}

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the base branch from main to akaday/advisory-improvement-4980 November 4, 2024 05:00
@shelbyc
Copy link
Contributor

shelbyc commented Nov 4, 2024

Hi @akaday, thank you for your interest in GHSA-9gqr-xp86-f87h, but the pull request changes the wording to be less specific about the mitigations available to users, and therefore I believe it is best to not include the suggested changes. Have a good week!

@advisory-database advisory-database bot closed this Nov 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the akaday-GHSA-9gqr-xp86-f87h branch November 4, 2024 22:20
@akaday
Copy link
Author

akaday commented Nov 4, 2024

@shelbyc Thank you for reviewing my pull request and providing feedback. I understand the importance of maintaining specific mitigations for users. I appreciate your insights and will take them into account for future contributions.
blessing to y and yours
Have a wonderful week!

Best regards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants