Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Energy History to Tesla Fleet #34943

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Bre77
Copy link
Contributor

@Bre77 Bre77 commented Sep 27, 2024

Proposed change

Add Energy History to Tesla Fleet

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new sensor entities for enhanced monitoring, including various consumer and grid-related sensors.
    • Improved export capabilities for selected sensors, allowing for better data management and analysis.

These updates enhance the Tesla Fleet integration by providing users with a broader range of monitored entities and improved data export options.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added in-progress This PR/Issue is currently being worked on needs-rebase The PR has been branched of the wrong base branch or targets an incorrect target branch next This PR goes into the next branch labels Sep 27, 2024
@home-assistant
Copy link

It seems that this PR is targeted against an incorrect branch. Documentation updates which apply to our current stable release should target the current branch. Please change the target branch of this PR to current and rebase if needed. If this is documentation for a new feature, please add a link to that PR in your description.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce multiple new sensor entities to the Tesla Fleet integration and update the export capabilities of existing sensors. New sensors include various consumer and grid metrics related to battery, generator, solar, and home usage. Some sensors have been marked as exportable, while others remain non-exportable, enhancing the overall monitoring capabilities of the integration.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/tesla_fleet.markdown Added 14 new sensors and updated export capabilities for existing sensors.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant TeslaFleetIntegration
    participant SensorData

    User->>TeslaFleetIntegration: Request sensor data
    TeslaFleetIntegration->>SensorData: Retrieve new sensors
    SensorData-->>TeslaFleetIntegration: Return sensor data
    TeslaFleetIntegration-->>User: Provide updated sensor data
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f10f777 and 5681810.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/tesla_fleet.markdown (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
source/_integrations/tesla_fleet.markdown (16)

188-188: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Consumer imported from battery" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


189-189: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Consumer imported from generator" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


190-190: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Consumer imported from grid" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


191-191: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Consumer imported from solar" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


193-193: LGTM: Sensor status updated correctly.

The "Generator exported" sensor has been correctly updated to be enabled by default. This change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and improves the out-of-the-box experience for users.


195-195: LGTM: Sensor status updated correctly.

The "Grid exported" sensor has been correctly updated to be enabled by default. This change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and improves the out-of-the-box experience for users.


196-196: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Grid exported from battery" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


197-197: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Grid exported from generator" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


198-198: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Grid exported from solar" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


199-199: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Grid imported" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


201-201: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Grid services exported" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


202-202: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Grid services imported" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


204-204: LGTM: Sensor status updated correctly.

The "Home usage" sensor has been correctly updated to be enabled by default. This change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and improves the out-of-the-box experience for users.


208-208: LGTM: New sensor added correctly.

The new sensor "Solar exported" has been added correctly to the Energy sites section. It follows the established naming convention and is properly marked as not enabled by default.


209-209: LGTM: Sensor status updated correctly.

The "Solar generated" sensor has been correctly updated to be enabled by default. This change is consistent with the AI-generated summary and improves the out-of-the-box experience for users.


188-213: Summary: Comprehensive update to Energy sites sensors

This update significantly enhances the Tesla Fleet integration by introducing several new sensors and modifying the status of existing ones in the Energy sites section. The changes include:

  1. Addition of new sensors for detailed energy flow monitoring (e.g., "Consumer imported from battery", "Grid exported from solar").
  2. Enabling several previously disabled sensors by default (e.g., "Generator exported", "Home usage").
  3. Maintaining consistency in naming conventions and default status across new and existing sensors.

These modifications align with the PR objectives of introducing energy history data for Tesla vehicles and improve the out-of-the-box experience for users of the Home Assistant platform.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5681810
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/66f638c2020b7c00082b4b40
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-34943--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo and removed needs-rebase The PR has been branched of the wrong base branch or targets an incorrect target branch labels Sep 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @Bre77 👍

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 added awaits-parent Awaits the merge of an parent PR and removed in-progress This PR/Issue is currently being worked on labels Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaits-parent Awaits the merge of an parent PR has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo next This PR goes into the next branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants