Update mikrotik.markdown #34989
Update mikrotik.markdown #34989
Conversation
The "need restricted privileges only" suggested to me that this integration needed access to functions that are restricted. Instead this section tries to limit the access it gets, which is very good. Hopefully this clarifies it a bit.
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe documentation for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant HomeAssistant
participant RouterOSAPI
User->>HomeAssistant: Enable RouterOS API
HomeAssistant->>RouterOSAPI: Send API request
RouterOSAPI-->>HomeAssistant: Return device status
HomeAssistant-->>User: Display device status
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- source/_integrations/mikrotik.markdown (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
source/_integrations/mikrotik.markdown
[typographical] ~65-~65: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...vileges in RouterOS To use this device tracker you only need limted privileges. To enh...(IN_ORDER_TO_VB_COMMA)
[style] ~65-~65: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...ik device create a "read only" user who is able to connect to API and perform ping test on...(BE_ABLE_TO)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/mikrotik.markdown (1)
Line range hint
1-71: Approved: Documentation clarity improvedThe changes successfully clarify the access privileges required for the Mikrotik integration, addressing the PR objectives. The modification emphasizes that only limited privileges are needed, which aligns with best practices for security.
The overall structure and content of the documentation remain consistent with Home Assistant standards. These changes will help users better understand the integration's requirements and how to set up the necessary permissions securely.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~65-~65: It seems that a comma is missing.
Context: ...vileges in RouterOS To use this device tracker you only need limted privileges. To enh...(IN_ORDER_TO_VB_COMMA)
[style] ~65-~65: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...ik device create a "read only" user who is able to connect to API and perform ping test on...(BE_ABLE_TO)
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The "need restricted privileges only" suggested to me that this integration needed access to functions that are restricted. Instead this section tries to limit the access it gets, which is very good.
Hopefully this clarifies it a bit.
Proposed change
Type of change
currentbranch).currentbranch).nextbranch).nextbranch).Additional information
Checklist
currentbranch.nextbranch.Summary by CodeRabbit
mikrotikintegration documentation for clarity on RouterOS API requirements.