[SV] Locks sentences #2395
[SV] Locks sentences #2395
Conversation
![home-assistant[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/97978?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍 |
home-assistant
bot
added
cla-recheck
cla-signed
and removed
cla-recheck
cla-needed
labels
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes include the addition of new responses and intent definitions for locking and unlocking mechanisms in Swedish. Specifically, new entries for the Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
responses/sv/HassTurnOn.yaml (1)
12-12: LGTM! Consider adding area-specific lock response.The addition of the Swedish response for the lock action is correct and aligns well with the existing structure. The translation "Låste" (Locked) is appropriate for the
HassTurnOnintent in the context of locks.For consistency with other entries like
lights_areaandcover_area, consider adding an area-specific response for locks. This could be useful for scenarios where you want to indicate locking all doors in a specific area. For example:lock_area: "Låste i {{ slots.area }}"This addition would provide more flexibility in responses related to locking actions.
sentences/sv/lock_HassTurnOn.yaml (1)
12-18: LGTM: Second intent structure is well-designed with a suggestion.The second intent structure is well-designed:
- It provides flexible sentence patterns for locking all or specific items in an area.
- The use of slots for domain and name is appropriate.
- It allows for locking multiple items with the "alla" (all) option.
Consider adding a comment explaining the meaning of "låsbar" and "i_på" for non-Swedish speakers, to improve code readability. For example:
# låsbar: lockable items (e.g., doors, windows) # i_på: prepositions "in" or "on"sentences/sv/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml (2)
4-10: LGTM: Well-structured intent definition with a suggestion for improvement.The first set of sentences for the
HassTurnOffintent is well-defined. It correctly allows for unlocking a specific lock by name, with an optional area specification. The context requirement and response type are appropriately set.Consider adding a comment to explain the use of "i_på" for non-Swedish speakers. For example:
sentences: # "i_på" covers both "in" and "on" prepositions in Swedish - "lås upp <name>[ i_på <area>]"
11-17: LGTM: Comprehensive intent definition with a suggestion for consistency.The second set of sentences for the
HassTurnOffintent is well-defined. It provides flexible options for unlocking all locks or specific locks, with or without area specification. The domain and name slots are correctly set.For consistency with the first set of sentences, consider using the same optional area syntax:
sentences: - "lås upp [<alla>] <låsbar>[ i_på <area>]" - "lås upp [<alla>] <låsbar>"This change would make the area specification optional in the first pattern, matching the style of the earlier definition.
tests/sv/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml (1)
3-11: Consider intent naming and response customization.The test case is well-structured, but there are two points to consider:
The intent name
HassTurnOffdoesn't seem intuitive for unlocking. Consider using a more specific name likeHassUnlockto improve clarity.The response "Låste upp" is correct, but it might be more natural to include the name of the door. For example: "Låste upp Ytterdörren".
Could you clarify the reasoning behind using
HassTurnOfffor unlocking? If it's a project-wide convention, please disregard the first point.tests/sv/lock_HassTurnOn.yaml (1)
1-23: Overall good structure with room for improvementThe file successfully defines test scenarios for Swedish lock-related intents with a clear and consistent structure. The multiple sentence variations in the second scenario provide good coverage for different phrasings, which is commendable.
However, there are a few areas for improvement that apply to both scenarios:
- Intent naming: Consider renaming "HassTurnOn" to a more specific name like "HassLock" or "HassDoorLock" to better reflect the locking action.
- Response enhancement: The responses could be more informative by including context (e.g., the door or area being locked).
- Slot usage: Review the necessity and clarity of the "name: alla" slot in the second scenario.
Addressing these points will enhance the clarity, consistency, and informativeness of the tests.
tests/sv/_fixtures.yaml (1)
98-103: LGTM: New lock entities added correctlyThe new lock entities "Ytterdörren" (Front door) and "Bakdörren" (Back door) are added correctly, following the existing structure and naming conventions. They are appropriately associated with the new "hallen" area, which is consistent with typical home layouts.
Consider adding a
stateproperty to these new entities for consistency with other entities in the file. For example:- name: Ytterdörren id: lock.ytterdorren area: hallen state: in: "låst" out: "locked"This addition would provide more comprehensive test fixtures for lock states in Swedish.
sentences/sv/_common.yaml (1)
344-344: LGTM: Comprehensive lock-related expansion rule addedThe new
låsbarexpansion rule effectively covers a wide range of lock-related terms in Swedish, including locks, doors, windows, gates, and garage doors. This addition significantly enhances the system's ability to recognize and process lock-related commands in various contexts.For consistency with other entries in the
expansion_rulessection, consider adding a colon afterlåsbar:- låsbar: "(lås[en]|dörr[ar|en|arna]|fönster|grind[ar|en|arna]|garagedörr[ar|en|arna])" + låsbar: ":(lås[en]|dörr[ar|en|arna]|fönster|grind[ar|en|arna]|garagedörr[ar|en|arna])"This minor change would align the
låsbarentry with the format used in other expansion rules likename:andarea:.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- responses/sv/HassTurnOff.yaml (1 hunks)
- responses/sv/HassTurnOn.yaml (1 hunks)
- sentences/sv/_common.yaml (2 hunks)
- sentences/sv/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml (1 hunks)
- sentences/sv/lock_HassTurnOn.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/sv/_fixtures.yaml (2 hunks)
- tests/sv/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml (1 hunks)
- tests/sv/lock_HassTurnOn.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (11)
responses/sv/HassTurnOff.yaml (2)
Line range hint
1-12: Overall file structure and format look goodThe overall structure and format of the file are consistent and well-organized. The YAML syntax is correct, and the indentation is properly maintained throughout the file.
Good job on maintaining a clean and readable configuration file. This consistency will make it easier for other contributors to understand and modify the responses in the future.
Line range hint
1-12: Verify consistent handling of lock/unlock actions across the systemWhile we've addressed the immediate inconsistency in the 'lock' response, it's important to ensure that lock/unlock actions are handled consistently across the entire system.
Please verify the following:
- Check if there's a corresponding
HassTurnOn.yamlfile for "turn on" actions, which should include the unlocking response.- Ensure that both locking and unlocking actions are properly represented in their respective files.
Run the following script to help with this verification:
This will help ensure that lock/unlock actions are handled consistently and correctly across different intents in the Swedish language responses.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Lock/Unlock actions are consistently handled across the system.
All necessary lock-related responses are present in both
HassTurnOn.yamlandHassTurnOff.yaml, ensuring consistent handling of locking and unlocking actions.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for HassTurnOn.yaml and verify lock-related entries # Test 1: Check if HassTurnOn.yaml exists echo "Checking for HassTurnOn.yaml:" fd -p "responses/sv/HassTurnOn.yaml" # Test 2: If it exists, check for lock-related entries in both files echo -e "\nChecking for lock-related entries in both files:" rg -i "lock:" responses/sv/HassTurnOn.yaml responses/sv/HassTurnOff.yaml # Test 3: Check for any other files that might contain lock-related responses echo -e "\nChecking for other files with lock-related responses:" rg -i "lock:" responses/sv/Length of output: 677
sentences/sv/lock_HassTurnOn.yaml (2)
5-10: LGTM: First intent structure is well-defined.The first intent structure is well-defined:
- It allows locking a specific item with an optional area specification.
- The context requirement ensures it's only used for locks.
- The response is appropriately set to "lock".
This structure provides good flexibility for users to lock specific items.
1-18: Overall: Well-structured intents with room for future enhancements.The file successfully defines intents for locking items in Swedish, providing good coverage for common use cases. The structures are flexible and should accommodate various user phrasings.
For future enhancements, consider:
- Adding more variations of locking commands if needed (e.g., time-based locking).
- Including examples in comments to illustrate how each intent would be used.
- Ensuring consistency with unlocking intents (if they exist or will be added later).
Great job on implementing these basic sentences for locks in Swedish!
sentences/sv/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml (2)
1-3: LGTM: Correct language declaration and intent structure.The file header correctly declares the language as Swedish (sv) and properly initiates the intents section with
HassTurnOff. This follows the expected YAML format for intent definitions.
1-17: Overall: Well-implemented intent definitions for unlocking locks in Swedish.This new file successfully introduces intent definitions for unlocking locks in Swedish. The implementation provides good flexibility with options for unlocking specific locks, all locks, and with or without area specifications. The YAML structure is correct, and the intent definitions are clear and functional.
The minor suggestions provided earlier for adding a comment and adjusting syntax for consistency would further enhance the file, but the current implementation is already of high quality and fit for purpose.
tests/sv/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml (1)
1-2: LGTM: File header is correct.The language specification and tests section are properly defined.
tests/sv/_fixtures.yaml (2)
13-14: LGTM: New area "Hallen" added correctlyThe new area "Hallen" (Hall) is added following the existing structure and naming conventions. This addition is relevant for lock-related fixtures and enhances the test coverage for Swedish language support.
13-14: Summary: Effective addition of lock-related test fixturesThe changes in this file effectively enhance the Swedish language test fixtures by adding a new area "Hallen" and two lock entities "Ytterdörren" and "Bakdörren". These additions are well-structured, follow existing conventions, and directly support the PR objective of introducing basic sentences for locks in Swedish.
The new fixtures will improve test coverage for lock-related functionalities in the Swedish language context, contributing to better localization and user experience for Swedish-speaking users.
Also applies to: 98-103
sentences/sv/_common.yaml (2)
69-74: LGTM: Lock states correctly defined in SwedishThe added
lock_statessection accurately maps Swedish lock-related terms to their English equivalents. This addition aligns well with the PR objective of introducing basic sentences for locks in Swedish.
- "[säkert ]låst" → "locked" (allows for both "låst" and "säkert låst")
- "upplåst" → "unlocked"
These mappings will enable proper interpretation of lock-related commands and status reports in Swedish.
69-74: Summary: Excellent additions for Swedish lock-related language supportThe changes in this file successfully introduce basic sentences and terms for locks in Swedish, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives. The additions include:
- Accurate mappings for lock states (locked and unlocked) in the
lock_statessection.- A comprehensive expansion rule for various lock-related terms in the
expansion_rulessection.These changes will significantly enhance the system's ability to understand and process lock-related commands in Swedish. The implementation is thorough and well-thought-out, covering a wide range of scenarios and terms.
Great job on improving language support for Swedish users!
Also applies to: 344-344
tests/sv/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml
Outdated
| - sentences: | ||
| - "lås upp alla lås i hallen" | ||
| - "Lås upp dörren i hallen" | ||
| intent: | ||
| name: HassTurnOff | ||
| slots: | ||
| area: Hallen | ||
| domain: lock | ||
| name: alla | ||
| response: "Låste upp" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve consistency and specificity in the second test case.
There are several points to address in this test case:
-
The two test sentences have different meanings (all locks vs. the door), but they use the same slots and response. Consider splitting this into two separate test cases.
-
The
nameslot is set to "alla" (all) which doesn't match the second sentence about a specific door. Update this to accurately reflect each test sentence. -
The response "Låste upp" doesn't indicate whether it's unlocking all locks or a specific door. Consider making the response more specific, e.g., "Låste upp alla lås i Hallen" or "Låste upp dörren i Hallen".
-
The capitalization in the test sentences is inconsistent. Standardize the capitalization, preferably starting each sentence with a capital letter.
Here's a suggested restructure:
- sentences:
- "Lås upp alla lås i hallen"
intent:
name: HassTurnOff
slots:
area: Hallen
domain: lock
name: alla
response: "Låste upp alla lås i Hallen"
- sentences:
- "Lås upp dörren i hallen"
intent:
name: HassTurnOff
slots:
area: Hallen
domain: lock
name: dörren
response: "Låste upp dörren i Hallen"This structure separates the two cases, uses appropriate slot values, and provides more specific responses.
sentences/sv/lock_HassTurnOff.yaml
Outdated
| - "lås upp [<alla>] <area> <låsbar>" | ||
| slots: | ||
| domain: "lock" | ||
| name: "alla" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would expect that this sentence should set the name to "all" and not "alla". Since it is not translated slot name.
Looking at DE and ES languages for example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh. My bad. Fixed in latest commit.
Basic sentences for locks in Swedish.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests