Mark tests which depend on ECS as expected fail; separate integration and unit tests

[mfisher87]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit d917999

I will automatically update this comment whenever this PR is modified

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 084ab7d

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 3430c89

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit b773376

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 25346ea

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.68%. Comparing base (0f2cfeb) to head (25346ea).

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development     #609      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        65.47%   66.68%   +1.21%     
===============================================
  Files               38       36       -2     
  Lines             3134     3077      -57     
  Branches           601      594       -7     
===============================================
  Hits              2052     2052              
+ Misses             991      935      -56     
+ Partials            91       90       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JessicaS11]

shouldn't the init.py and conftest.py files remain at the icepyx/tests directory level? Otherwise the integration tests won't pick up the auth info from conftest.

[mfisher87]

Yes, excellent catch, thank you! I thought I had the conftest.py in the integration directory, but clearly not! Both types of tests turn out to require fixtures from conftest.py. I'd recommend having one conftest.py for unit tests and another for integration tests, but didn't want to increase the scope of the PR :) The __init__.py seems to not be needed.

b773376

[mfisher87]

Integration tests run:

https://github.com/icesat2py/icepyx/actions/runs/11040360996/job/30668167255

The tests marked xfail have status XPASS (unexpected pass), which is considered OK by default.

Resolved requests

[JessicaS11]

Something funny happened with the timing and I can't get the unit tests to run and report a status based on 9a9d67a. But they were passing before the UML updates so I'm going to use admin to merge. See #618.