-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: checkstyle configuration and suggested updates #7003
Conversation
jeremylong
commented
Oct 1, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- fixes several checkstyle warnings
- add checkstyle back into PR workflow
- add spotbugs back into the PR workflow
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
* Example values: | ||
* - binary "https://dl.google.com/geosdk/GoogleMaps.json" "7.2.0" | ||
* - git "https://gitlab.matrix.org/matrix-org/olm.git" "3.2.16" | ||
* - github "alinradut/SwiftEntryKit" "95f4a08f41ddcf2c02e2b22789038774c8c94df5"" | ||
* - github "CocoaLumberjack/CocoaLumberjack" "3.8.5" | ||
* - github "realm/realm-swift" "v10.44.0" | ||
* Example values: - binary "https://dl.google.com/geosdk/GoogleMaps.json" | ||
* "7.2.0" - git "https://gitlab.matrix.org/matrix-org/olm.git" "3.2.16" - | ||
* github "alinradut/SwiftEntryKit" | ||
* "95f4a08f41ddcf2c02e2b22789038774c8c94df5"" - github | ||
* "CocoaLumberjack/CocoaLumberjack" "3.8.5" - github "realm/realm-swift" | ||
* "v10.44.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jeremylong Might be good to still post-merge review and correct occurrences like this in the delta that transformed 'nicely coded, but horribly rendered by Javadoc' to 'horribly coded, and horribly rendered by Javadoc' javadoc comments.
They should've been converted to proper HTML <ul>
+ <li>
to be rendered as intended by the original written code rather than reformatted to have the bulleted items all rendered as 'standard javadoc text paragraph'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I love autoformatting sometimes... Thanks for pointing this out.