Update kettle image to match that in k8s.io deployment file.

[michelle192837]

Similar to #33628, pretty sure no jobs care about this file but I'm updating it for consistency.

Ref: #33381

[BenTheElder]

/lgtm
/approve

TODO: maybe we should just point to the k8s.io deployment, I think we might be the only ones running kettle anywhere anyhow, it's not really fixed up to be generic currently and has some hard-coded kubernetes-isms (which also might need revisiting, like the log sanitation given we've had changes to k/k testing ........ @aojea @pohly something else for the backlog -- we have hard-coded regexes here to strip pointers, log timestamps and other per-run noise to improve failure message clustering)

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, michelle192837

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• kettle/OWNERS [BenTheElder,michelle192837]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[pohly]

we have hard-coded regexes here to strip pointers, log timestamps and other per-run noise to improve failure message clustering

I think those should still work - or at least I don't remember anything which might break it. Of course, double-checking wouldn't hurt, if someone wants to look into this.

[BenTheElder]

I think those should still work - or at least I don't remember anything which might break it. Of course, double-checking wouldn't hurt, if someone wants to look into this.

yeah, they mostly seem to work, but we haven't re-checked this assumption in nearly a decade and it's probably worth looking at sometime