Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC4175: Profile field for user time zone #4175

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

clokep
Copy link
Member

@clokep clokep commented Aug 5, 2024

@clokep clokep added proposal A matrix spec change proposal needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration client-server Client-Server API kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff and removed feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration labels Aug 5, 2024
Co-authored-by: Will Hunt <[email protected]>
@Half-Shot
Copy link
Contributor

Half-Shot commented Sep 6, 2024

matrix-org/matrix-react-sdk#12967 is an implementation of this.

@girlbossceo
Copy link

conduwuit server-side partial implementation: girlbossceo/conduwuit@f163ebf#diff-6f6ce4833edde4b67f9f5c950adce5338f3e3a19b6d287c33ff4e9d290b94fa1

ruwuma (our ruma fork) partial implementation for conduwuit:

The partial implementation only supports GET/PUT/DELETE for just the us.cloke.msc4175.tz field. More thought into supporting "generic" K-V fields is being done, but at least gets a basic implementation through the door that can be usable in any future clients that implement the timezone field (which seems likely soon 😇).

@clokep
Copy link
Member Author

clokep commented Sep 10, 2024

Judging by this having an implementation I think this isn't really a draft anymore.

@clokep clokep marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2024 21:19
@clokep clokep removed the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client-server Client-Server API kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants