feat: add ArrayLike to xref

[nstarman]

No description provided.

[stefanv]

Seems fine to me; anyone else have any objections to this going in?

[rossbar]

My understanding is that the parameter descriptions are encouraged to be "for humans" rather than for type checkers, but ArrayLike is pretty clear so no objection from me.

I'd probably link it to the :term: like the others which includes a description of what array like means, but that's splitting hairs.

[larsoner]

I'd probably link it to the :term: like the others which includes a description of what array like means, but that's splitting hairs.

I suspect this part might actually matter depending on what default_role is. So seems safer / more general to be explicit

[nstarman]

Done!

[rossbar]

Suggested change

	"ArrayLike": ":term:`numpy.typing.ArrayLike`",
	"ArrayLike": ":term:`numpy:array_like`",

Here's the description of the term array_like vs. the description of the term typing.ArrayLike.

I still think the former is likely what you'd want to link to for users: it describes what array_like means, as opposed to how the annotation is expected to behave in a static typing context.

Not a blocker though, feel free to do as you see fit!