-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 612
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fastapi: fix wrapping of middlewares #3012
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice comment and test!
@adriangb Please take a look at the failing tests |
# are handled. | ||
# This should not happen unless there is a bug in OpenTelemetryMiddleware, but if there is we don't want that | ||
# to impact the user's application just because we wrapped the middlewares in this order. | ||
stack = ServerErrorMiddleware(stack) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to clarify, is the purpose of this pr to handle exceptions generated from the OpenTelemetryMiddleware
itself (if there is a bug) or unhandled exceptions thrown from the request?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep! If there is a bug in OpenTelemetryMiddleware
without this double wrapping then the server might not send a 500 to the client and instead abruptly disconnect. In practice I believe every ASGI server I know of does also have it's own handling of unhandled exceptions such that this would not be the case, but I'm not sure we want to rely on that + there would still be a noticeable change (different response content at least, maybe different headers, etc.)
fixes #795 |
MRE:
With this change it shows up properly
Run this and you'll see that there is no
"http.status_code": 500
in the logs.