-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8341168: Cleanup dead code after JDK-8322630 #21255
Conversation
👋 Welcome back aboldtch! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@xmas92 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, but one small nit.
// The type of the contained stubs (i.e., InterpreterCodelet). | ||
// Must be a subclass of type Stub. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is interesting. The StubQueue seems to work against an interface and that interface used to have two implementing classes. Now that one of the is gone, we might want to reconsider if we need this interface. There seems to be a lot of code that could be remove in this area. See DEF_STUB_INTERFACE
and how it is being used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, looks fine.
Thanks for the reviews. |
Going to push as commit ad5ffcc.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
JDK-8322630 / #17495 removed the the concept of ICStubs, InlineCache buffers and related safepoints.
There are a handfull of references and auxiliary constructs still in the code, I propose we clean these out.
This removes the unused:
InlineCacheBufferSize
optionInlineCacheBuffer_lock
mutexThread::_missed_ic_stub_refill_verifier
fieldVM_ICBufferFull
VM operationProgress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21255/head:pull/21255
$ git checkout pull/21255
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21255
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21255/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21255
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21255
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21255.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment