Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8341168: Cleanup dead code after JDK-8322630 #21255

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

xmas92
Copy link
Member

@xmas92 xmas92 commented Sep 30, 2024

JDK-8322630 / #17495 removed the the concept of ICStubs, InlineCache buffers and related safepoints.

There are a handfull of references and auxiliary constructs still in the code, I propose we clean these out.

This removes the unused:

  • Experimental InlineCacheBufferSize option
  • InlineCacheBuffer_lock mutex
  • Thread::_missed_ic_stub_refill_verifier field
  • VM_ICBufferFull VM operation

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8341168: Cleanup dead code after JDK-8322630 (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21255/head:pull/21255
$ git checkout pull/21255

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21255
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21255/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21255

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21255

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21255.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 30, 2024

👋 Welcome back aboldtch! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 30, 2024

@xmas92 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8341168: Cleanup dead code after JDK-8322630

Reviewed-by: stefank, tschatzl, mli, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 988a531: 8340181: Shenandoah: Cleanup ShenandoahRuntime stubs
  • 822a773: 8340605: Open source several AWT PopupMenu tests
  • 6514aef: 8340419: ZGC: Create an UseLargePages adaptation of TestAllocateHeapAt.java

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 30, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 30, 2024

@xmas92 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@stefank stefank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but one small nit.

src/hotspot/share/runtime/thread.hpp Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +55 to +56
// The type of the contained stubs (i.e., InterpreterCodelet).
// Must be a subclass of type Stub.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is interesting. The StubQueue seems to work against an interface and that interface used to have two implementing classes. Now that one of the is gone, we might want to reconsider if we need this interface. There seems to be a lot of code that could be remove in this area. See DEF_STUB_INTERFACE and how it is being used.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 30, 2024
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, looks fine.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 30, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 30, 2024
@xmas92
Copy link
Member Author

xmas92 commented Oct 1, 2024

Thanks for the reviews.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Going to push as commit ad5ffcc.
Since your change was applied there have been 22 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 1, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 1, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 1, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 1, 2024

@xmas92 Pushed as commit ad5ffcc.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants