ART partitions can be different on the same board revisions #5
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some TP-Link boards have been found (TP-Link TL-WR841N v10 TPD 2050500527 10663 1530) where crystals from different charges have been used. Thus the 'Caps Tuning' and other fields don't match. This refutes the theory that a physical (including their marks) indistinguishability of boards means that the ART partitions are equal. The question if e.g. TP-Link calibrates the devices on a per-charge or per-device basis remains.
Edit: One of the crystals' charges is more shiny than the other.