Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ART partitions can be different on the same board revisions #5

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

CodeFetch
Copy link

@CodeFetch CodeFetch commented Apr 6, 2019

Some TP-Link boards have been found (TP-Link TL-WR841N v10 TPD 2050500527 10663 1530) where crystals from different charges have been used. Thus the 'Caps Tuning' and other fields don't match. This refutes the theory that a physical (including their marks) indistinguishability of boards means that the ART partitions are equal. The question if e.g. TP-Link calibrates the devices on a per-charge or per-device basis remains.

Edit: One of the crystals' charges is more shiny than the other.

Some TP-Link boards have been found (TP-Link TL-WR841N v10 TPD 2050500527 10663 1530) where crystals from different charges have been used. Thus the 'Caps Tuning' and other fields don't match. This refutes the theory that a physical (including their marks) indistinguishability of boards means that the ART partitions are equal. The question if e.g. TP-Link calibrates the devices on a per-charge or per-device basis remains.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant