DOC: Small modification of error message

[j-t-1]

No description provided.

[j-t-1]

class ViewerPreferences(DictionaryObject):
    def _get_bool(self, key: str, deft: Optional[BooleanObject]) -> BooleanObject:
        return self.get(key, deft)

@pubpub-zz what is deft here? Can it be renamed for readability?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.36%. Comparing base (92bb037) to head (2af3a12).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2956   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.36%   96.36%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        8744     8744           
  Branches     1589     1589           
=======================================
  Hits         8426     8426           
  Misses        190      190           
  Partials      128      128           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[stefan6419846]

The name is default, as you can easily see from its usage as dict.get(key, default).

[j-t-1]

It is obvious! I was reading it like a word, and not making the connection. Using "default" instead, would be marginally better? Unsure if good practice to do so.

[stefan6419846]

The official name inside the stdlib is default: https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#dict.get

[j-t-1]

Right. So would be okay to change? Or are you saying because of this it would not be okay to change?

[stefan6419846]

It is internal and improves readability, thus changing it is possible and makes sense to avoid doubts.

[pubpub-zz]

I prefered not to use default as a variable name. I have no objection to change it.