Vmicro #4938
Vmicro #4938
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications to the environment variable configurations and application structure in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
apps/web-antd/src/bootstrap.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.15.0 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find module '/node_modules/@vben/eslint-config/dist/index.mjs' imported from /eslint.config.mjs Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (32)
apps/web-antd/vite.config.mts (2)
8-8: Reconsider auto-opening browser in micro-frontend contextThe
open: truesetting might not be ideal in a micro-frontend architecture where multiple applications run simultaneously. This could lead to multiple browser windows opening during development.Consider making this configurable or defaulting to
false:- open: true, + open: process.env.AUTO_OPEN === 'true',
Proxy configurations are consistent across micro-frontends with a minor target URL discrepancy
The proxy configurations are almost identical across all micro-frontend applications (web-antd, web-ele, web-naive, and playground), with the same path rewriting, changeOrigin, and overall structure. However, there's a minor inconsistency where playground uses '127.0.0.1' while others use 'localhost' in the target URL.
playground/vite.config.mts: useshttp://127.0.0.1:5320/api- Other configs: use
http://localhost:5320/apiWhile both URLs resolve to the same location, it's recommended to standardize the URL format across all configurations for consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
9-16: Verify proxy configuration consistency across micro-frontendsSince this is part of a micro-frontend integration, ensure the proxy configuration aligns with other micro-frontend applications.
Let's verify the proxy configurations across the project:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check proxy configurations across all Vite configs # to ensure consistency in micro-frontend setup echo "Searching for all Vite config files..." fd -e ts -e mts "vite.config" | while read -r file; do echo "\nChecking proxy configuration in $file:" rg -A 5 "proxy:\s*{" "$file" doneLength of output: 1616
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's fix the regex and try again echo "Searching for all Vite config files..." fd -e ts -e mts "vite.config" | while read -r file; do echo "\nChecking proxy configuration in $file:" rg -A 5 '"proxy"' "$file" || rg -A 5 'proxy:' "$file" doneLength of output: 2238
apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/demos.ts (2)
3-4: Remove outdated commentThe comment referencing "BasicLayout" is no longer relevant since the component has been replaced with
LayoutContent.-// BasicLayout import { LayoutContent } from '#/layouts';
Line range hint
7-31: Consider micro-frontend routing requirementsSince this PR introduces micro-frontend integration, consider adding micro-frontend specific metadata to the route configuration. This could include:
- Flags to indicate which routes should be accessible in micro-frontend context
- Configuration for route synchronization with the parent application
- Handling of shared state and navigation
Example enhancement:
const routes: RouteRecordRaw[] = [ { component: LayoutContent, meta: { icon: 'ic:baseline-view-in-ar', keepAlive: true, order: 1000, title: $t('demos.title'), + microApp: { + shared: true, + syncRoute: true + } }, name: 'Demos', // ... rest of the configuration } ];playground/index.html (1)
Inconsistent analytics implementation across applications
The Baidu analytics script is commented out only in the playground app but remains active in all other applications (web-antd, web-ele, web-naive). This inconsistency suggests that the analytics removal was not intended to be a global change. Each app also uses a different tracking ID, indicating separate analytics configurations:
- playground: d20a01273820422b6aa2ee41b6c9414d (commented)
- web-antd: b38e689f40558f20a9a686d7f6f33edf (active)
- web-ele: 97352b16ed2df8c3860cf5a1a65fb4dd (active)
- web-naive: 24bb3eb91dfe4ebfcbcee6952a107cb6 (active)
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
17-29: Verify the intentional removal of analytics tracking.The Baidu analytics script has been commented out, which will disable user tracking in production. Please confirm if this is intentional and if there are alternative analytics solutions in place.
Run the following script to check for any alternative analytics implementations:
Let me generate one more verification script to check if the Baidu analytics script is still active or commented out in other apps:
This will help us verify if the analytics removal is consistent across all apps and if it's part of a broader strategy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for analytics-related code in the codebase # Search for analytics-related patterns echo "Checking for alternative analytics implementations..." rg -i "analytics|tracking|hm\.baidu\.com|google-analytics|gtag" --type html --type ts --type js # Check if similar changes were made in web-antd echo "Verifying consistent analytics removal across apps..." rg -l "hm\.baidu\.com" apps/web-antd/Length of output: 9038
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the status of Baidu analytics script across all apps echo "Checking analytics script status in all app entry points..." for file in playground/index.html apps/web-*/index.html; do echo "=== $file ===" # Get 3 lines before and after any line containing baidu.com to see if it's commented rg -C 3 "hm\.baidu\.com" "$file" doneLength of output: 2019
playground/src/bootstrap.ts (1)
Line range hint
19-54: Implementation looks good, consider adding documentationThe bootstrap implementation correctly integrates micro-frontend support while maintaining a clear separation of concerns. Consider adding:
- JSDoc comments for the bootstrap function describing its purpose and parameters
- Documentation about the micro-frontend lifecycle and initialization process
Add JSDoc comments:
+/** + * Bootstraps the application with micro-frontend support + * @param namespace - The namespace for store initialization + * @returns Promise<void> + */ async function bootstrap(namespace: string) {packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/use-content-spinner.ts (1)
31-36: LGTM! Consider adding TypeScript typesThe addition of
to.meta.microcheck is a good enhancement to support micro-frontend routes. The implementation maintains consistency between both route guards.Consider adding TypeScript types to improve type safety:
interface RouteMeta { loaded?: boolean; iframeSrc?: string; micro?: boolean; } // Update route guard parameter router.beforeEach((to: { meta: RouteMeta }) => { // ... existing code }); router.afterEach((to: { meta: RouteMeta }) => { // ... existing code });Also applies to: 46-51
playground/src/router/routes/modules/micro.ts (2)
4-4: Consider implementing internationalization supportThe commented-out localization imports and usage suggest that i18n support was planned but not implemented. Consider implementing proper internationalization to support multiple languages.
Would you like help implementing the localization setup using the
$tfunction?Also applies to: 12-13
8-16: Consider documenting the significance of the order valueThe
order: 1000seems to be a magic number. Consider adding a comment explaining its significance in the routing hierarchy or consider defining it as a constant with a meaningful name.packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue (5)
7-8: Clean up commented code or document its purpose.The commented import of
EventCenterForMicroAppsuggests potential future functionality or removed code. If it's needed for future implementation, please add a TODO comment explaining the intended use. Otherwise, remove it to maintain clean code.
11-17: Enhance type safety and add documentation for the IMicro interface.While the interface captures the essential properties, consider these improvements:
- Add JSDoc comments explaining the purpose of each property
- Consider removing the index signature
[key: string]: anyto enforce stricter type checking+/** + * Interface defining the structure of a micro-frontend configuration + */ interface IMicro { + /** Unique identifier for the micro-frontend */ name: string; + /** Hash value for routing */ hash: string; + /** Host URL where the micro-frontend is served */ host: string; + /** Base route for the micro-frontend */ baseroute: string; - [key: string]: any; }
32-48: Enhance error state UX and add loading state handling.The current error state could be more user-friendly and informative:
- Raw JSON output might not be helpful for users
- Error messages should be in English
- Consider adding a loading state
<template> <Page class="h-1/1 micro-view !m-0 !p-0"> + <div v-if="loading" class="flex h-full items-center justify-center"> + <Spin /> + </div> <micro-app - v-if="microData" + v-else-if="microData" :baseroute="microData.baseroute" :data="microData" :level="2" :name="microData.name" :url="microData.host" /> <div v-else class="flex h-full flex-col justify-center"> - <p class="mt-2">{{ JSON.stringify(microData) }}</p> - <p class="mt-2">子服务 加载异常</p> - <p class="mt-2">异常详情在控制台查看</p> + <Alert + type="error" + message="Micro-frontend Loading Error" + description="Failed to load the micro-frontend service. Please check the console for detailed information." + show-icon + /> </div> </Page> </template>
49-56: Review the use of !important and selector specificity.The current styling approach raises some concerns:
- Usage of
!importantsuggests potential style conflicts that should be resolved through proper CSS specificity- The direct child selector
& > divmight be too broad and could affect unintended elementsConsider using more specific selectors and removing
!important:.micro-view { - & > div { + &__container { - padding: 0 !important; - margin: 0 !important; + padding: 0; + margin: 0; } }Then update the template accordingly:
-<div v-else class="flex h-full flex-col justify-center"> +<div v-else class="micro-view__container flex h-full flex-col justify-center">
1-56: Consider adding crucial micro-frontend architectural patterns.The component would benefit from additional architectural patterns common in micro-frontend implementations:
- Error boundaries to prevent cascading failures
- Retry mechanisms for failed loads
- Cross-application communication handlers
- Loading and error states management
- Lifecycle hooks for cleanup
Would you like me to provide examples of these patterns?
apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/vben.ts (2)
11-12: Remove unnecessary commentThe commented line "// BasicLayout" is redundant since the component is no longer used.
-// BasicLayout import { IFrameView, LayoutContent } from '#/layouts';
Line range hint
31-78: Consider architectural implications of iframe usage in micro-frontend contextThe current implementation uses IFrameView for external content (docs, GitHub, previews). In a micro-frontend architecture, consider:
- Security: Ensure proper Content Security Policy (CSP) headers for iframe content
- Performance: Multiple iframes might impact application performance
- User Experience: Consider lazy loading strategies for iframe content
Consider implementing a more integrated approach using micro-frontend capabilities instead of iframes for better performance and user experience.
packages/@core/ui-kit/shadcn-ui/src/components/spinner/spinner.vue (2)
Line range hint
6-15: Add missing English documentation and consider increasing default loading time.
- The
spinningprop is missing English documentation.- Consider increasing the default
minLoadingTimeto prevent flickering (common practice is 200-300ms)./** * @zh_CN loading状态开启 + * @en_US Enable loading state */ spinning?: boolean;
Line range hint
20-57: Address potential memory leak and clean up commented code.
- The component should clean up the timer when unmounted to prevent memory leaks.
- Remove commented performance tracking code if it's no longer needed.
Add onBeforeUnmount hook to clean up the timer:
import { ref, watch } from 'vue'; +import { onBeforeUnmount } from 'vue'; // ... existing code ... -// const startTime = ref(0); const showSpinner = ref(false); const renderSpinner = ref(true); const timer = ref<ReturnType<typeof setTimeout>>(); +onBeforeUnmount(() => { + clearTimeout(timer.value); +}); watch( () => props.spinning, (show) => { if (!show) { showSpinner.value = false; clearTimeout(timer.value); return; } - // startTime.value = performance.now(); timer.value = setTimeout(() => { - // const loadingTime = performance.now() - startTime.value; showSpinner.value = true; if (showSpinner.value) { renderSpinner.value = true; } }, props.minLoadingTime); }, { immediate: true, }, );packages/@core/composables/src/use-layout-style.ts (2)
32-33: LGTM! The viewport-relative height calculation improves layout flexibility.The change from fixed height to viewport-relative minimum height (
calc(100vh - ${top}px)) is a good improvement that provides better layout containment for micro-frontend integration. This ensures the overlay properly fills the available space while maintaining correct positioning.
32-32: Remove commented code.The commented calculation should be removed as it's no longer needed and could cause confusion. If needed, this information can be preserved in the git history.
- // height: `calc(100vh - ${top}px)`, //`${height}px`,packages/@core/base/typings/src/vue-router.d.ts (1)
101-109: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation.The
microproperty is well-structured for micro-frontend configuration. However, the documentation could be more detailed.Consider expanding the documentation to provide more context:
/** * 微服务配置 + * Used for configuring micro-frontend routes + * @property baseroute - Base route path for the micro-app navigation + * @property hash - Hash mode configuration for the micro-app + * @property host - Host URL where the micro-app is deployed + * @property name - Unique identifier for the micro-app */ micro?: { baseroute: string; // 微服务基础路由 hash: string; // 微服务 hash host: string; // 微服务地址 name: string; // 微服务名称 };packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/content.vue (1)
84-84: Remove commented debug code.Debug statements like
console.clear()should be removed rather than commented out, as they can create noise in the codebase.-// console.clear();apps/web-antd/src/useChildMicro.ts (4)
1-6: Clean up unnecessary comments and ensure consistency in documentation language.The file contains unnecessary import comments and mixed language usage in comments. Consider removing the non-descriptive comments and maintaining English throughout the codebase for consistency.
-// 子服务设置 - -// useUserStore import { useAccessStore } from '@vben/stores'; -// preferences import { updatePreferences } from '@vben/preferences';
12-24: Add JSDoc documentation for the Window interface extension.The global Window interface extension is missing documentation for its purpose and usage. Consider adding comprehensive JSDoc documentation to improve maintainability.
+/** + * Extends the global Window interface with micro-frontend capabilities. + * Provides typing for micro-app specific properties and methods used in the application. + */ declare global { interface Window { microApp: { dispatch(data: { AppName: string; data: unknown }): void; getData(): Record<string, unknown>; } & EventCenterForMicroApp; __MICRO_APP_NAME__: string; __MICRO_APP_ENVIRONMENT__: string; __MICRO_APP_BASE_APPLICATION__: string; } }
37-41: Enhance interface documentation and type specificity.While the interface is well-structured, consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments for each property
- Using a more specific type for
mainPreferencesinstead ofRecord<string, unknown>interface IMicroAppData { + /** Authentication token for the micro-frontend application */ accessToken?: string /* token */; + /** Target route hash for navigation */ hash?: string /* 路由地址 */; + /** System configuration preferences from the main application */ - mainPreferences?: Record<string, unknown> /* 系统配置项 */; + mainPreferences?: { + theme?: string; + locale?: string; + [key: string]: unknown; + }; }
54-77: Remove commented out debug code.The file contains multiple blocks of commented out code that should be removed to improve maintainability.
- // Object.keys(data).forEach((key) => { - // console.warn(`子应用获得基座数据 ${key}: `, data[key]); - // }); - // // 向基座发送数据 - // setTimeout(() => { - // // MAIN_ROUTER.push('/'); - // window.microApp.dispatch({ - // AppName: data.AppName, - // data: '向基座发送数据' + data.hash, - // }); - // }, 3000);packages/@core/base/design/src/css/global.css (1)
Line range hint
31-36: Consider adding micro-frontend isolation styles.For better micro-frontend integration, consider adding isolation styles to prevent style leakage between the main app and micro apps.
Add these styles within the existing selector:
.app, #app, body, html { @apply size-full; + /* Micro-frontend isolation */ + @apply relative; + + /* Prevent style leakage */ + micro-app { + @apply isolation-auto; + } }apps/web-antd/src/bootstrap.ts (3)
74-74: Standardize console messages to a single languageThe console warning combines Chinese and English:
'微应用卸载了,微应用的 unmount() fired'. For consistency and maintainability, consider standardizing all console messages to a single language or implementing localization.You could update the console message to be entirely in English:
- console.warn('微应用卸载了,微应用的 unmount() fired'); + console.warn('Micro application has been unmounted, micro app\'s unmount() fired');
79-79: Standardize console messages to a single languageThe console warning uses Chinese:
'检测微应用环境'. To maintain consistency across the codebase, consider using a single language for all log messages or implementing a localization strategy.Update the console message as follows:
- console.warn('检测微应用环境', window.__MICRO_APP_ENVIRONMENT__); + console.warn('Micro-frontend environment detected', window.__MICRO_APP_ENVIRONMENT__);
89-89: Standardize console messages to a single languageThe console warning is in Chinese:
'非微前端环境'. For consistency, consider translating it to English or ensuring all log messages are localized appropriately.Here's the updated console message:
- console.warn('非微前端环境'); + console.warn('Non-micro-frontend environment');playground/src/useMicro.ts (2)
34-34: Refine Logging Statements in Lifecycle MethodsThe lifecycle methods
afterhidden,aftershow, andbeforeshowlog theCustomEventobject directly, which may result in uninformative messages like"[object CustomEvent]". Consider extracting relevant properties from the event for clearer logging.Suggested changes:
- console.warn(`子应用${e}推入后台时`); + console.warn(`子应用${e.detail.appName || e.type}推入后台时`);Apply similar changes to
aftershowandbeforeshowmethods to enhance the clarity of the logs.Also applies to: 37-37, 43-43
89-91: Externalize Hardcoded URLs for MaintainabilityThe URL
'http://localhost:5777/vben-antd/'is hardcoded, which may not be suitable for different environments or deployment scenarios. Consider externalizing this URL using environment variables or configuration files to improve flexibility and maintainability.Suggested changes:
+ const VBEN_ANTD_URL = import.meta.env.VITE_VBEN_ANTD_URL || 'http://localhost:5777/vben-antd/'; ... code = code.replaceAll( /(from|import)(\s*['"])(\/vben-antd\/)/g, (all: string) => { return all.replace( '/vben-antd/', - 'http://localhost:5777/vben-antd/', + VBEN_ANTD_URL, ); }, );Ensure to define
VITE_VBEN_ANTD_URLin your environment variables for different environments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (41)
apps/web-antd/.env(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/.env.analyze(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/.env.development(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/.env.production(0 hunks)apps/web-antd/index.html(2 hunks)apps/web-antd/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/src/bootstrap.ts(3 hunks)apps/web-antd/src/layouts/index.ts(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/src/preferences.ts(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/src/router/access.ts(2 hunks)apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/dashboard.ts(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/demos.ts(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/vben.ts(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/src/useChildMicro.ts(1 hunks)apps/web-antd/vite.config.mts(1 hunks)internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts(1 hunks)internal/vite-config/src/plugins/nitro-mock.ts(2 hunks)packages/@core/base/design/src/css/global.css(1 hunks)packages/@core/base/typings/src/vue-router.d.ts(1 hunks)packages/@core/composables/src/use-layout-style.ts(1 hunks)packages/@core/ui-kit/shadcn-ui/src/components/spinner/spinner.vue(1 hunks)packages/effects/layouts/package.json(2 hunks)packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/content.vue(4 hunks)packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/use-content-spinner.ts(2 hunks)packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/effects/layouts/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue(1 hunks)playground/.env(1 hunks)playground/.env.analyze(0 hunks)playground/.env.development(0 hunks)playground/.env.production(1 hunks)playground/index.html(2 hunks)playground/package.json(2 hunks)playground/src/bootstrap.ts(2 hunks)playground/src/layouts/index.ts(1 hunks)playground/src/preferences.ts(1 hunks)playground/src/router/routes/modules/micro.ts(1 hunks)playground/src/useMicro.ts(1 hunks)playground/vite.config.mts(1 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- apps/web-antd/.env.production
- playground/.env.analyze
- playground/.env.development
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- apps/web-antd/.env
- apps/web-antd/.env.analyze
- apps/web-antd/.env.development
- apps/web-antd/src/preferences.ts
- apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/dashboard.ts
- packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/index.ts
- playground/.env
🔇 Additional comments (44)
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/index.ts (2)
1-1: Verify the impact of wildcard exports
The wildcard export makes all entities from './content' accessible through this module. Let's verify what exactly is being exported to ensure we're not exposing unintended entities.
✅ Verification successful
Wildcard export is safe and well-structured
The wildcard export from './content' is exporting two well-defined components (LayoutContent, LayoutContentSpinner) and one utility function (useContentSpinner). This aligns with the layout restructuring objective and maintains a clean public API through the basic layout module.
- All exports from the content module are layout-specific and properly prefixed
- The exports complement the existing
BasicLayoutexport - The structure follows a consistent pattern seen across other layout components (header, footer, menu, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the exports from the content module
# Expected: List of exported entities from the content module
# Check for exported entities in the content module
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_' packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content.ts
# Check for any files importing from this module to understand usage
rg -l "from ['\"]@/layouts/basic['\"]" || rg -l "from ['\"].*layouts/src/basic['\"]"
Length of output: 265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the content.ts file exists and its location
fd content.ts
# Check the directory structure under layouts
fd . packages/effects/layouts/src/basic
# Look for any exports related to content or layout in the basic directory
rg "export.*content|export.*layout" --ignore-case packages/effects/layouts/src/basic
Length of output: 2785
2-2: Clarify the migration strategy for BasicLayout
According to the PR objectives, BasicLayout is being replaced with LayoutContent in various modules. However, this file still exports BasicLayout. Please clarify:
- Is
BasicLayoutbeing gradually phased out? - Should we add a deprecation notice if this is temporary?
- Are there any remaining dependencies on
BasicLayoutthat prevent its immediate removal?
packages/effects/layouts/src/index.ts (2)
4-4: Verify the micro module implementation
The export aligns with the PR's micro-frontend integration objectives. Let's verify the micro module's implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Export from micro module is properly implemented and used
The verification confirms that:
- The micro module exists at
packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/ - It exports the
MicroAppViewcomponent frommicro-app-view.vue - The component is properly imported and used in the playground routes
- The export statement in
index.tscorrectly exposes the module
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the micro module implementation
# Expected: Find the micro module and its contents
# Check if the micro directory exists and show its contents
fd --type f --base-directory packages/effects/layouts/src micro/
# Look for MicroAppView component mentioned in the summary
rg -t vue "MicroAppView" packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/
Length of output: 485
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the micro module
# Check if the micro directory exists and list its contents
fd micro packages/effects/layouts/src
# Look for any files containing MicroAppView
rg "MicroAppView"
# Check for any TypeScript files in the micro directory
fd -e ts micro packages/effects/layouts/src
# Look for exports from micro module
rg "from './micro'" packages/effects/layouts/src
Length of output: 890
7-7: Verify the layout-ui dependency integration
The LayoutUI namespace export aligns with the PR's layout adjustment objectives. Let's verify the dependency and its integration.
✅ Verification successful
Dependency and usage verification completed successfully
The @vben-core/layout-ui package is:
- Properly declared as a workspace dependency in
packages/effects/layouts/package.json - Located at
packages/@core/ui-kit/layout-ui - Correctly used in:
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/layout.vue(importsVbenAdminLayout)apps/web-antd/src/layouts/index.ts(re-exportsLayoutUI)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify layout-ui dependency and its usage
# Expected: Find the dependency and its usage in the project
# Check if the dependency is properly declared
rg -l "@vben-core/layout-ui" "**/package.json"
# Look for LayoutUI usage in the codebase
rg "LayoutUI\." --type ts
Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the dependency and its usage
# First, let's find all package.json files
fd "package.json"
# Then check for any references to layout-ui in the codebase
rg -i "layout-ui"
# Also search for potential usages of LayoutUI
rg -i "layoutui" --type ts
# Look for the actual @vben-core directory or package
fd "vben-core"
Length of output: 2801
playground/.env.production (2)
11-11: Verify server configuration for History mode routing
Switching from hash to history mode requires proper server configuration to handle SPA routing. Ensure that the server is configured to redirect all routes to index.html, otherwise direct URL access will result in 404 errors.
Example nginx configuration needed:
location / {
try_files $uri $uri/ /index.html;
}11-11: Verify routing consistency across micro-frontends
The change to history mode routing needs to be consistent across all micro-frontend applications to prevent routing conflicts.
Run the following to check routing configurations across all apps:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the router configuration in these files.
Router configuration is consistent across all micro-frontends
The verification shows that all micro-frontend applications (playground, web-ele, web-naive, and web-antd) use the same router configuration pattern that reads from VITE_ROUTER_HISTORY environment variable. They all consistently switch between hash and history modes based on this variable's value. The change to history mode in playground's production environment will work correctly as all applications follow the same configuration pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check routing mode configuration across all apps
# Look for router configuration files and env files
# Search for router configuration files
echo "Checking router configuration files:"
rg -l "createRouter|history|hash" --type ts
# Search for VITE_ROUTER_HISTORY in all env files
echo -e "\nChecking environment files:"
fd -e .env -e .env.development -e .env.production -x cat {} \; -x echo "--- {} ---" \;
Length of output: 1228
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual router configuration in the main router files
echo "Checking main router configuration in playground:"
rg -A 5 "createRouter" playground/src/router/index.ts
echo -e "\nChecking main router configuration in web-ele:"
rg -A 5 "createRouter" apps/web-ele/src/router/index.ts
echo -e "\nChecking main router configuration in web-naive:"
rg -A 5 "createRouter" apps/web-naive/src/router/index.ts
echo -e "\nChecking main router configuration in web-antd:"
rg -A 5 "createRouter" apps/web-antd/src/router/index.ts
# Check for router history mode configuration in env files
echo -e "\nChecking VITE_ROUTER_HISTORY in all env files:"
rg "VITE_ROUTER_HISTORY" -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 4285
playground/src/layouts/index.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM! Clean export implementation.
The export statement maintains consistency with the existing pattern while adding the new MicroAppView component.
5-5: LGTM! Verify @vben/layouts module.
The dynamic import implementation follows the existing pattern and supports code splitting. Let's verify the module exists and exports the expected component.
✅ Verification successful
MicroAppView component exists and is properly integrated
The component is correctly implemented and exported:
- Found in
packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue - Properly exported via
packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/index.ts - Successfully imported and used in multiple places including router configuration
- Implementation shows it's a Vue component that handles micro-frontend integration using
@micro-zoe/micro-app
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the MicroAppView component exists in @vben/layouts
# Search for MicroAppView export in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'export { $$$ MicroAppView $$$ }'
# Search for MicroAppView component definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const MicroAppView = $$$'
Length of output: 216
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MicroAppView in @vben/layouts package source
fd -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" -d 3 layouts | xargs rg "MicroAppView" -A 2
# Search for any exports containing MicroAppView
rg "export.*MicroAppView"
# Search for component definition using AST
ast-grep --pattern 'class MicroAppView {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'function MicroAppView($$$) {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'const MicroAppView = $$$' -l
Length of output: 1601
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the micro-app-view.vue file
rg -p "packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue" -l
cat "packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue" 2>/dev/null
# Verify the import path in the module system
rg -p "@vben/layouts" --type ts
# Check if the component is properly exported from the package
rg -p "from '@vben/layouts'" --type ts
Length of output: 2236
playground/src/preferences.ts (2)
13-15: LGTM! Theme configuration looks good.
The addition of automatic theme mode provides a good default for system preference-based theming.
13-15: Consider theme synchronization in micro-frontend context.
Since this is part of a micro-frontend implementation, consider how theme preferences will be synchronized between the main application and child micro-apps. You might need to:
- Implement theme state sharing mechanism between parent and child applications
- Handle theme change propagation across micro-frontend boundaries
- Ensure consistent theme application across all micro-frontend components
Let's check if there are any theme-related handlers in the micro-frontend setup:
apps/web-antd/src/layouts/index.ts (2)
9-9: LGTM! Export statement is properly updated.
The export statement maintains a clean, alphabetically ordered list of all components, aligning with the PR's layout adjustment objectives.
5-7: LGTM! The new layout component imports follow existing patterns.
The dynamic imports maintain consistency with the existing code structure and follow code splitting best practices.
Let's verify the '@vben/layouts' package and component usage:
✅ Verification successful
The dynamic imports of LayoutUI and LayoutContent are valid and properly configured
The verification shows that:
- The
@vben/layoutspackage exists and is properly configured in the workspace - The package exports both
LayoutUIandLayoutContentcomponents:LayoutUIis re-exported from@vben-core/layout-uiLayoutContentis exported fromcontent.vue
The dynamic imports in apps/web-antd/src/layouts/index.ts follow the correct pattern for code splitting and maintain consistency with existing imports.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify package existence and component usage
# Check if @vben/layouts is properly configured
fd -t f "package.json" | xargs rg "@vben/layouts"
# Check usage of new components
rg -t typescript -t vue "LayoutUI|LayoutContent" --type-add "vue:*.vue"
Length of output: 470
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the package and component usage with correct file types
# Check the actual layout components in @vben/layouts package
fd . "packages/effects/layouts" -t f -e ts -e tsx -e vue | xargs cat
# Search for usage with proper file extensions
rg "LayoutUI|LayoutContent" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type-add 'vue:*.vue' -t ts -t vue
Length of output: 130841
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package contents and usage with a more focused search
# Check the actual exports from @vben/layouts package
fd . "packages/effects/layouts/src" -t f -e ts -e tsx | xargs cat
# Search for imports/usage of these components
rg "import.*\{.*(?:LayoutUI|LayoutContent).*\}.*from.*@vben/layouts" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type-add 'vue:*.vue' -t ts -t vue
Length of output: 17895
playground/vite.config.mts (1)
8-8: LGTM: Developer experience improvement
The addition of open: true enhances developer workflow by automatically launching the browser when the server starts.
apps/web-antd/src/router/access.ts (2)
12-12: LGTM! Import addition aligns with layout requirements.
The addition of LayoutContent to the imports is consistent with the PR's objective to enhance layout handling.
22-22: Verify the impact of LayoutContent on existing routes.
The addition of LayoutContent to layoutMap enables its use in route generation. Since this is a significant layout change, we should verify its integration with existing routes.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual route configurations to understand how LayoutContent is being used and if there's any potential conflict with BasicLayout.
LayoutContent is properly integrated with existing routes
The verification shows that LayoutContent is already being used consistently in the demo routes (vben.ts and demos.ts) while BasicLayout serves a different purpose in dashboard routes. This is a valid coexistence pattern where:
- LayoutContent is used for content-focused routes (demos and vben sections)
- BasicLayout is retained for the dashboard section which likely requires a different layout structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of LayoutContent in route configurations
# Expected: Find routes that have been updated to use LayoutContent
# Search for route configurations using LayoutContent
echo "Searching for LayoutContent usage in route configurations..."
rg -l "component.*LayoutContent" "apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/"
# Check for any remaining BasicLayout usage that might need updating
echo "Checking for remaining BasicLayout usage..."
rg -l "component.*BasicLayout" "apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/"
Length of output: 511
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation of routes using LayoutContent and BasicLayout
echo "Checking LayoutContent usage in vben.ts..."
rg "component.*LayoutContent" "apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/vben.ts" -A 5
echo "\nChecking LayoutContent usage in demos.ts..."
rg "component.*LayoutContent" "apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/demos.ts" -A 5
echo "\nChecking BasicLayout usage in dashboard.ts..."
rg "component.*BasicLayout" "apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/dashboard.ts" -A 5
Length of output: 1006
apps/web-antd/index.html (2)
Line range hint 17-29: Verify the removal of Baidu analytics tracking
The Baidu analytics script has been commented out. Please confirm if this is intentional and whether analytics tracking should be handled differently in the micro-frontend architecture (e.g., by the parent application).
Run the following script to check for any other analytics implementations:
32-32: Verify consistent usage of the new container ID
The root container ID has been changed from app to antd-app to support micro-frontend integration. This change requires corresponding updates in other files.
Run the following script to verify consistent usage of the new ID:
Consider adding a comment in the HTML explaining the purpose of the ID change and its relationship to the micro-frontend architecture. This will help future maintainers understand the reasoning behind these specific IDs.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the ID usage.
This script will help us:
- Find mount/initialization code with any container ID
- Locate and examine bootstrap files that typically contain app initialization
- Get a broader view of how the application is mounted
Based on the search results, I can see that the ID change is consistently implemented:
- In
apps/web-antd/src/bootstrap.ts, the mount point is correctly using#antd-app - In
apps/web-antd/index.html, the container has the new IDantd-app - Other apps like web-naive and web-ele maintain their own separate mount points (
#app)
This aligns with the micro-frontend architecture where each app needs its own unique mount point. Let me generate the final response:
ID change is correctly implemented for micro-frontend integration
The container ID change from app to antd-app is properly synchronized with the mount point in the bootstrap code, and this change appropriately isolates the Ant Design app's mount point from other micro-frontend apps in the system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for references to both old and new container IDs
echo "Checking for old 'app' ID references that might need updating..."
rg "#app['\"]|getElementById\(['\"]app" --type ts --type js --type vue
echo "Verifying usage of new 'antd-app' ID..."
rg "#antd-app['\"]|getElementById\(['\"]antd-app" --type ts --type js --type vue
echo "Checking mount/unmount implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'createApp($app).mount("#app")'
Length of output: 605
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to app mounting/initialization
echo "Searching for mount/initialization patterns..."
rg -t js -t ts "mount\(.*#.*\)|getElementById\(.*\)"
echo "Searching for bootstrap or main files..."
fd -e ts -e js "bootstrap|main|index" --type f
echo "Checking content of potential bootstrap files..."
for file in $(fd -e ts -e js "bootstrap|main|index" --type f); do
echo "=== Content of $file ==="
cat "$file"
done
Length of output: 145977
playground/index.html (1)
32-32: Verify micro-frontend integration points.
The app container has been updated to use micro-main-app ID and app class, which is crucial for micro-frontend architecture. This change needs to be consistent with the mounting points in the bootstrap code and any child micro-apps.
Run the following script to verify the integration points:
✅ Verification successful
The micro-frontend integration point is correctly configured
The verification shows that the micro-main-app mounting point in playground/index.html is consistent with the bootstrap configuration:
- The mounting point
#micro-main-appis correctly used inplayground/src/bootstrap.ts - The micro-frontend setup is properly configured in
playground/src/useMicro.ts - The integration is part of a larger micro-frontend architecture as evidenced by related configurations in multiple files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistency of micro-frontend integration
# Check mounting point in bootstrap files
echo "Checking mounting points in bootstrap files..."
rg "micro-main-app" --type ts
# Check for micro-app configurations
echo "Checking micro-app configurations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'createApp($app).mount("#micro-main-app")'
# Check for related class usage
echo "Checking .app class usage..."
rg "\.app\s*{" --type css
Length of output: 582
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify with corrected commands and gather more context
# Check mounting points and related code
echo "Checking mounting points and related code..."
rg "micro-main-app" -t ts -A 3 -B 3
# Check for app class usage with fixed regex
echo "Checking .app class usage..."
rg "\.app\s?\{" -t css
# Check main app configuration
echo "Checking main app configuration..."
fd bootstrap.ts --exec cat {}
# Check for any micro-frontend related configuration
echo "Checking micro-frontend configuration..."
fd -e ts -e js -e json | xargs rg "micro|qiankun|wujie" -l
Length of output: 7329
playground/src/bootstrap.ts (2)
17-17: Verify the existence and implementation of useMicro module
The imported module is crucial for micro-frontend initialization.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the implementation of the microAppInit export since we confirmed the file exists but need to check its contents.
Let me try a different approach to check the implementation using ripgrep to see the actual content of the file.
Import of microAppInit is correctly implemented
The module exists at playground/src/useMicro.ts and exports the microAppInit function as expected. The implementation shows it's properly configured for micro-frontend initialization with router integration and appropriate micro-app settings.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and implementation of useMicro module
# Expected: Find the module and its microAppInit export
# Check if the file exists
fd -t f "useMicro.ts" playground/src
# Verify the export
ast-grep --pattern 'export { microAppInit }' playground/src
Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of microAppInit in useMicro.ts
ast-grep --pattern 'export const microAppInit = $_' playground/src
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of useMicro.ts to understand the implementation
rg -A 10 "microAppInit" playground/src/useMicro.ts
Length of output: 439
25-26: Verify the initialization order and improve documentation
The micro-app initialization is placed between component adapter and i18n setup. Consider:
- Documenting why this specific initialization order is necessary
- Translating the Chinese comment to English for better international collaboration
Consider updating the comment to English:
- // 初始化微应用
+ // Initialize micro-application✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the micro-app initialization dependencies and configuration.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as I have sufficient information about the initialization order across different applications in the codebase.
Consider keeping the current initialization order and update documentation
The micro-app initialization order (after component adapter, before i18n) appears to be intentional as it's specific to the playground app, while other apps (web-antd, web-ele, web-naive) don't initialize micro-apps at all. The current order in playground is correct because:
- Component adapter needs to be initialized first as it's a core dependency
- Micro-app initialization requires router but doesn't depend on i18n
- i18n setup can safely run after micro-app initialization as it only affects the main app's localization
Suggestions:
- Keep the Chinese comment but add English translation above it:
+ // Initialize micro-application
// 初始化微应用
await microAppInit(router);🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the initialization order is consistent across the codebase
# Expected: Find similar patterns in other bootstrap files
# Search for similar initialization patterns
rg -B 5 -A 5 "microAppInit.*router" --type ts
Length of output: 1188
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any dependencies between micro-app and i18n initialization
rg -B 10 -A 10 "setupI18n|microAppInit" --type ts
# Look for any configuration or documentation about initialization order
fd -e md -e ts -H -I . -x rg -l "initialization|bootstrap.*order"
Length of output: 22019
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/use-content-spinner.ts (1)
31-36: Verify micro-frontend route configurations
Let's ensure that routes using micro-frontend components properly set the meta.micro property.
Also applies to: 46-51
✅ Verification successful
Micro-frontend integration is properly configured
The verification confirms that the meta.micro check in use-content-spinner.ts is correctly integrated with the micro-frontend setup:
- The codebase uses
@micro-zoe/micro-appfor micro-frontend implementation - Route configurations properly set
meta.microproperties inplayground/src/router/routes/modules/micro.ts - The type definition in
packages/@core/base/typings/src/vue-router.d.tscorrectly declares themicrometa property - Micro-frontend components and initialization are properly handled in both main app (
playground/src/useMicro.ts) and child apps (apps/web-antd/src/useChildMicro.ts)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for route configurations with micro-frontend components
rg -l "meta.*micro.*true" --type ts
# Search for micro-app component usage to cross-reference with routes
ast-grep --pattern 'micro-app name="$_" $$$'
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for micro-frontend related configurations and components
# Search for any route meta with 'micro' property
rg "meta.*micro" --type ts -A 2
# Search for micro-frontend related imports and configurations
rg "micro" --type ts -A 2
# Search for micro-app related code with different component syntax
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "@micro-$_"'
ast-grep --pattern '<micro-app $$$>'
Length of output: 6705
packages/effects/layouts/package.json (1)
Line range hint 23-43: Verify workspace package versions
The dependency list includes multiple workspace packages. Let's ensure version consistency across the monorepo.
Run the following script to check workspace package versions:
✅ Verification successful
All workspace packages are using the correct workspace protocol
The verification shows that all @vben/* packages across the monorepo are consistently using the workspace:* protocol. No packages were found using incorrect version specifications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify workspace package versions across the monorepo
# Find all package.json files and check @vben/* dependencies
echo "Checking @vben/* package versions across the monorepo:"
fd -t f "package.json" | xargs rg '"@vben/[^"]+": "workspace:\*"' -l
# Verify that all @vben packages use the workspace protocol
echo -e "\nChecking for @vben packages not using workspace protocol:"
fd -t f "package.json" | xargs rg '"@vben/[^"]+": "[^w][^"]*"'
Length of output: 918
playground/src/router/routes/modules/micro.ts (1)
1-54: Verify security configurations for micro-frontend integration
Since this implements micro-frontend integration with cross-origin communication:
- Ensure proper CORS headers are configured on the micro app server
- Update Content Security Policy (CSP) to allow loading resources from the micro app domain
- Validate the integrity of loaded micro apps
apps/web-antd/package.json (2)
29-29: Verify the version resolution for "catalog:" specifier
The new dependency uses the "catalog:" version specifier, which is consistent with other external dependencies in this project. However, this is a non-standard npm version specifier.
✅ Verification successful
"catalog:" version specifier is valid and consistent with project configuration
The "catalog:" version specifier is a custom version resolution mechanism defined in the project's pnpm-workspace.yaml. The file contains a catalog section that maps package names to their specific versions, including "@micro-zoe/micro-app": "^1.0.0-rc.13". This versioning approach is consistently used across the project's dependencies and is properly configured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how "catalog:" versions are resolved in the project
# Check if there's documentation about version resolution
fd -t f "README|CONTRIBUTING" -X grep -l "catalog:"
# Check for custom version resolution configuration
fd -t f "package.json|pnpm-workspace.yaml|.npmrc" -X grep -l "catalog:"
Length of output: 1590
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check pnpm-workspace.yaml content for version resolution configuration
cat pnpm-workspace.yaml
# Check root package.json for any version resolution configuration
cat package.json | jq '.resolutions, .pnpm, .overrides'
# Check .npmrc file if it exists
fd -t f ".npmrc" -X cat {}
Length of output: 5286
29-29: Verify security and maintenance status of @micro-zoe/micro-app
Since this is a third-party package being introduced for micro-frontend support, we should verify its security status and maintenance activity.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the package's activity and community adoption.
@micro-zoe/micro-app appears to be a stable and actively maintained package
The package shows healthy maintenance and community adoption:
- No security vulnerabilities reported
- Active development with latest commit on Nov 15, 2024
- Latest release (v1.0.0-rc.13) from Oct 16, 2024
- Significant community adoption with 5.6k GitHub stars
- Steady weekly downloads (~2.4k)
- Active issue tracking with maintainer engagement
While still in RC (Release Candidate) status, the package demonstrates consistent maintenance and security practices.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package security and maintenance status
# Check npm for latest versions and download stats
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@micro-zoe/micro-app | jq '{latest: .["dist-tags"].latest, modified: ._time.modified, maintainers: .maintainers}'
# Check for known vulnerabilities
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "@micro-zoe/micro-app") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 795
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check GitHub repository stats and activity
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "micro-zoe", name: "micro-app") {
stargazerCount
issues(states: OPEN) { totalCount }
pullRequests(states: OPEN) { totalCount }
releases(first: 1) {
nodes {
publishedAt
tagName
}
}
defaultBranchRef {
target {
... on Commit {
history(first: 1) {
nodes {
committedDate
}
}
}
}
}
}
}'
# Check weekly downloads
curl -s https://api.npmjs.org/downloads/point/last-week/@micro-zoe/micro-app
Length of output: 935
playground/package.json (3)
34-34: Verify lodash-es usage and tree-shaking
The addition of lodash-es and its types suggests new utility functions. Ensure proper ES module imports for tree-shaking.
Also applies to: 52-52
✅ Verification successful
✅ Proper tree-shakeable lodash-es import pattern confirmed
The codebase uses named imports from lodash-es (import { cloneDeep } from 'lodash-es'), which is the correct pattern for enabling tree-shaking. Only one usage was found in playground/src/useMicro.ts, and it follows the recommended ES module import pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check lodash-es import patterns
# Look for proper ES module imports (good)
rg "import\s+{\s*[^}]+}\s+from\s+['\"](lodash-es|@vben)"
# Look for potential full imports (bad for tree-shaking)
rg "import\s+\*\s+as\s+_\s+from\s+['\"]lodash-es['\"]"
Length of output: 264
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any lodash-es imports (both named and namespace imports)
rg "from ['\"']lodash-es['\"']" -A 1
# Also check for any lodash imports (in case it's mixed usage)
rg "from ['\"']lodash['\"']" -A 1
# Find all files that might use lodash-es
rg "lodash-es" --type ts --type js --type tsx --type jsx
Length of output: 273
Line range hint 32-52: Verify version resolution strategy
The "catalog:" version specifier is used for all new dependencies. Ensure this aligns with the project's version management strategy.
✅ Verification successful
Version resolution strategy using "catalog:" is consistent across the project
The verification shows that the "catalog:" version specifier is widely used across the project's package.json files, including the root package.json and various packages in the monorepo structure. This is a deliberate and consistent version management strategy used throughout the project, managed by pnpm (version 9.13.2) as the package manager.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version resolution consistency
# Check if other package.json files use similar version strategy
fd -t f "package.json" -x grep -l "catalog:" {}
Length of output: 1492
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the root package.json to understand the version resolution strategy
cat package.json | grep -A 10 -B 10 "\"packageManager\""
# Also check if there's any documentation about version management
fd -t f "README.md" -x grep -i -A 5 -B 5 "version" {}
Length of output: 2933
32-32: Verify micro-app integration configuration
The addition of @micro-zoe/micro-app aligns with the PR's micro-frontend integration objectives. However, ensure proper configuration in the Vue application.
✅ Verification successful
Micro-app integration is properly configured
The verification shows that @micro-zoe/micro-app is correctly integrated:
- Proper initialization in
playground/src/useMicro.tswith complete configuration including lifecycle hooks, sandbox settings, and router integration - Correct implementation of micro-app component in
packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue - Integration with main application's bootstrap process as seen in main.ts
- Proper data communication setup between main and child applications
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify micro-app configuration and usage
# Check if micro-app is properly configured in main.ts/bootstrap.ts
rg -l "import\s+.*from\s+['\"]\@micro-zoe\/micro-app['\"]"
# Check for micro-app tags usage
rg "<micro-app\s+"
Length of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify micro-app configuration and usage with corrected regex
# Check if micro-app is properly configured in main.ts/bootstrap.ts
rg -l "@micro-zoe/micro-app"
# Check for micro-app tags usage in template files
rg -l "<micro-app"
# Check main entry files for configuration
fd "main.ts|bootstrap.ts" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 9165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the micro-app configuration files to understand the setup
# Check useMicro.ts content
cat playground/src/useMicro.ts
# Check micro-app-view.vue content
cat packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue
# Check if there are any micro-app configuration files
fd -e ts -e js "micro.*config"
Length of output: 4759
apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/vben.ts (1)
17-17: Verify layout compatibility with micro-frontend integration
The change from BasicLayout to LayoutContent aligns with the micro-frontend integration objectives. However, we should verify the following:
- Compatibility with child routes and iframe content
- Proper handling of micro-frontend content within the new layout
✅ Verification successful
Layout change is compatible with micro-frontend integration
The change from BasicLayout to LayoutContent is safe and properly integrated:
- The route
/vben-adminusesLayoutContentas the parent layout - Child routes under this path correctly use
IFrameViewcomponent for micro-frontend content - Only the dashboard module still uses
BasicLayout, which is appropriate as it's a different section
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other routes that might need similar updates and verify layout usage
# Check for other routes still using BasicLayout
echo "Checking for other routes using BasicLayout..."
rg "component:\s+BasicLayout" "apps/web-antd/src/router"
# Check for other layout-related configurations that might need updates
echo "Checking for related layout configurations..."
rg "LayoutContent" "apps/web-antd/src/layouts" -A 5
Length of output: 693
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation and usage of LayoutContent in @vben/layouts
echo "Checking @vben/layouts package for LayoutContent implementation..."
fd -e ts -e tsx "LayoutContent" packages/layouts
# Check for any child routes under vben-admin
echo "Checking child routes under vben-admin..."
rg "path.*vben-admin.*children" apps/web-antd/src/router -A 10
# Check for iframe-related configurations
echo "Checking iframe configurations..."
rg "IFrameView|iframe" apps/web-antd/src/router
Length of output: 1153
packages/@core/ui-kit/shadcn-ui/src/components/spinner/spinner.vue (3)
Line range hint 58-80: LGTM! Well-structured template with proper transition handling.
The template implementation:
- Uses semantic class names
- Properly handles visibility transitions
- Follows accessibility best practices with proper z-index and backdrop blur
Line range hint 81-127: LGTM! Well-implemented LESS styles with clean animation definitions.
The style implementation:
- Uses proper LESS nesting
- Has well-organized keyframe animations
- Maintains clean and maintainable structure
Line range hint 1-127: Verify spinner behavior in micro-frontend context.
Since this PR focuses on micro-frontend integration, let's verify that the spinner behavior aligns with the micro-frontend requirements, particularly during route transitions and app loading.
✅ Verification successful
Spinner implementation aligns with micro-frontend requirements
The spinner component is correctly implemented for micro-frontend integration:
- It's explicitly disabled for micro-frontend routes (
to.meta.micro) - The implementation allows independent loading states for micro apps
- The spinner's behavior respects the micro-frontend architecture by not interfering with micro app loading
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for micro-frontend related configurations and usages
# Check for micro-frontend related route configurations
rg -l "meta.micro"
# Check for spinner usage in micro-frontend context
rg -l "VbenSpinner.*micro"
# Check for related configurations in micro-app setup
rg -l "VITE_INJECT_APP_LOADING"
Length of output: 444
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check spinner implementation in micro-frontend context
rg -A 10 "VbenSpinner" packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/content.vue
rg -A 10 "VbenSpinner" packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/use-content-spinner.ts
# Check micro app loading configuration
rg -A 5 "VITE_INJECT_APP_LOADING" internal/vite-config/src/utils/env.ts
# Check micro app view implementation
rg -A 10 "meta.micro" packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue
Length of output: 1030
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content spinner implementation and its relation to micro apps
cat packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/use-content-spinner.ts
# Check if spinner is used in any micro app loading scenarios
rg -A 5 "loading.*spinner" packages/effects/layouts/src/
rg -A 5 "spinner.*loading" packages/effects/layouts/src/
Length of output: 1453
packages/@core/base/typings/src/vue-router.d.ts (1)
101-109: Verify the usage of the new micro-frontend route configuration.
Let's ensure the new micro property is being used consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the micro-frontend configuration usage.
The micro property is being used correctly and consistently across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- The
microproperty interface matches its implementation in route configurations - The
MicroAppViewcomponent correctly validates and uses all required fields (name, hash, host, baseroute) - The micro-frontend routes are properly configured in
playground/src/router/routes/modules/micro.ts - Integration with
@micro-zoe/micro-appis consistent with the type definition
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the usage of the new micro property in route configurations
# Search for route definitions using the micro property
echo "Checking route definitions with micro property..."
rg -t ts "micro:\s*{" --glob "**/*routes*.ts"
# Search for MicroAppView component usage
echo "Checking MicroAppView component usage..."
rg -t ts "MicroAppView" --glob "**/*.ts"
# Search for @micro-zoe/micro-app related configurations
echo "Checking micro-app configurations..."
rg -t ts "@micro-zoe/micro-app"
Length of output: 1239
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for micro property usage with fixed regex
echo "Checking route definitions with micro property..."
rg -t ts 'micro:\s?\{' -A 5
# Check the micro-app-view component implementation
echo "Checking MicroAppView implementation..."
cat packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue
# Check micro route configuration
echo "Checking micro route configuration..."
cat playground/src/router/routes/modules/micro.ts
Length of output: 3943
internal/vite-config/src/plugins/nitro-mock.ts (2)
39-39: LGTM!
The URL display change from 'localhost' to '127.0.0.1' is a cosmetic update with no functional impact.
88-88: Security consideration: Verify the need for listening on all network interfaces.
The server is now configured to listen on all network interfaces (0.0.0.0) instead of just localhost. While this might be necessary for micro-frontend architecture, it could potentially expose the mock server to unauthorized access.
Consider:
- Adding IP filtering or authentication if the mock server contains sensitive data
- Restricting to localhost if external access isn't required
- Documenting the security implications in the README
Let's check if there are any security measures in place:
packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/content.vue (3)
65-66: LGTM! Improved code readability.
The added spacing and explicit component name extraction enhance code clarity.
14-14: Clarify the intention of commented micro-frontend code.
The commented-out micro-frontend related code suggests incomplete implementation. Given that micro-frontend integration is a key objective of this PR, please either:
- Implement the micro-frontend integration if it's ready
- Remove the commented code if it's not needed
- Add a TODO comment explaining the future implementation plan
Let's check if micro-frontend integration is implemented elsewhere:
Also applies to: 56-58
97-103: Verify the impact of template changes.
Two significant changes require verification:
- The new div wrapper around the component could affect layout/styling
- Using
route.nameinstead ofroute.fullPathas the key might prevent component re-renders when only route parameters change
Let's check for potential layout issues and route parameter dependencies:
Also applies to: 108-108
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Template changes appear safe to implement
-
The div wrapper addition is safe as there are no direct CSS styles targeting the component that would be affected by the extra wrapper. The content component's styling is managed through standard layout classes and v-show directive.
-
Changing from
route.fullPathtoroute.nameas key is also acceptable:- The codebase shows minimal usage of route.params, with only one instance found
- No existing patterns were found that rely on fullPath for component keying
- Using route.name provides more stable component lifecycle management, as it won't trigger unnecessary re-renders for query parameter changes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for CSS targeting the component directly
rg -g '*.{css,scss,less}' "\.ant-.*component|\.vben-.*component"
# Check for routes with parameters that might need re-rendering
ast-grep --pattern 'route: {
$$$
params: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to verify both concerns:
# 1. Check for CSS/styling related to the content component
rg -g '*.{css,scss,less,vue}' 'content.*\{' -A 5
rg -g '*.vue' '<style.*>' -A 10 packages/effects/layouts/src/basic/content/
# 2. Check route definitions and usages
rg -g '*.{ts,js,vue}' 'route\.params' -A 2
rg -g '*.{ts,js,vue}' 'fullPath.*key' -B 2 -A 2
# 3. Look for similar component rendering patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'component :is="$_" :key="$_"'
Length of output: 27108
apps/web-antd/src/useChildMicro.ts (1)
58-60: Review token handling security.
Direct token handling in the micro-frontend could pose security risks. Consider:
- Implementing token validation before storage
- Using secure storage mechanisms
- Adding token expiration handling
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the token validation and storage implementation more thoroughly.
Token handling implementation is secure
The current token handling implementation already incorporates robust security measures:
- Tokens are stored securely with proper state management using Pinia store
- Token refresh mechanism is implemented with queue handling for concurrent requests
- HTTP-only cookies are used for refresh tokens
- Token expiration is handled with automatic refresh flows
- Bearer token format is properly enforced
- Clear separation between access and refresh tokens
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other token handling implementations
rg -A 5 "setAccessToken|getAccessToken" --type ts
Length of output: 6338
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check token validation and storage implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function formatToken($_) { $$$ }'
# Check access store implementation
cat packages/stores/src/modules/access.ts
# Check token refresh and expiration handling
rg -A 5 "refreshToken|tokenExpir" --type ts
Length of output: 14687
packages/@core/base/design/src/css/global.css (1)
Line range hint 31-36: LGTM! Verify layout behavior in micro-frontend context.
The addition of .app class alongside #app supports the micro-frontend architecture while maintaining backward compatibility. The size-full utility ensures consistent full-size layout.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The .app class addition is properly implemented and works with micro-frontend architecture
The verification confirms:
- The
.appclass is uniquely defined in global.css without conflicts - Micro-frontend integration uses
micro-appcomponent with proper layout containment - The micro-frontend view has its own scoped styles that don't interfere with the global
.appclass
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of .app class in micro-frontend context
# Look for potential conflicting styles or layout issues
# Search for any custom styles that might override .app class
rg -g '*.{css,scss,less}' 'class.*app.*{'
# Look for micro-app container elements that might need the .app class
rg -g '*.{vue,tsx,jsx}' '<micro-app'
Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for .app class styles with proper regex escaping
rg -g '*.{css,scss,less}' '\.app\s*{|\.app[,\s]'
# Search for micro-app container and its usage context
rg -g '*.{vue,tsx,jsx}' -B 2 -A 2 '<micro-app'
# Look for any app-related class assignments in components
rg -g '*.{vue,tsx,jsx}' 'class=["'\''].*app.*["'\'']'
Length of output: 922
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for .app class with fixed regex
rg -g '*.{css,scss,less}' '\.app[\s{,]'
# Check the micro-app-view component's full content
cat packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue
# Look for any app-related styles in the micro-frontend layout
rg -g '*.{css,scss,less}' 'micro-view'
Length of output: 1561
pnpm-workspace.yaml (2)
48-48: LGTM: Lodash ESM integration looks good.
The addition of lodash-es and its corresponding types package is a good choice:
- Uses ESM format which enables better tree-shaking
- Type definitions version aligns well with the runtime version
- Both are stable releases
Also applies to: 119-119
33-33: Consider the stability implications of using a release candidate version.
The @micro-zoe/micro-app@^1.0.0-rc.13 is a release candidate version. While it aligns with the PR's micro-frontend integration objectives, using an RC version in production could introduce instability.
Let's check for any stable releases and known issues:
✅ Verification successful
Using RC version 1.0.0-rc.13 is acceptable for production
Based on the NPM registry data:
- The package has been actively maintained with regular releases
- RC.13 is the latest version and was released recently (October 16, 2024)
- The RC phase has been stable since September 2023 (RC.0) with consistent updates
- The package has been in development since 2021 with a mature codebase
While it's a release candidate, the version 1.0.0-rc.13 represents over a year of RC phase stability and active maintenance, making it suitable for production use.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check NPM registry for latest versions and release dates
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@micro-zoe/micro-app | jq -r '.["dist-tags"], ."time"'
# Check GitHub issues for critical bugs in RC versions
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "micro-zoe", name: "micro-app") {
issues(last: 10, states: OPEN, labels: ["bug"]) {
nodes {
title
body
createdAt
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 10792
internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts (1)
61-65: LGTM! Configuration aligns with micro-frontend integration.
The Vue compiler configuration correctly enables micro-app custom elements, which is essential for the micro-frontend integration mentioned in the PR objectives.
Let's verify if there are any existing custom elements that might be affected:
Consider adding a comment above the configuration to document the purpose:
template: {
compilerOptions: {
+ // Allow micro-app custom elements for micro-frontend integration
isCustomElement: (tag) => tag.startsWith('micro-app'),
},
},✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. This new approach:
- Looks for any custom elements (tags with hyphens)
- Searches for custom element configurations more broadly
- Checks for micro-app related code
- Examines Vue configuration files
This will help us better understand the custom element landscape in the codebase.
This will help us understand:
- How micro-apps are currently implemented
- Whether the new configuration aligns with existing usage
- If there are any conflicting compiler configurations
Configuration is correctly implemented for micro-frontend integration
The verification confirms that:
- The
micro-appcustom element is actively used inpackages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue - The implementation uses
@micro-zoe/micro-apppackage as intended - No conflicting Vue compiler configurations were found
- The custom element configuration aligns with the actual usage in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for existing custom elements in Vue templates
# This helps ensure we're not breaking any existing custom element handling
# Search for custom elements in .vue files
rg -g '*.vue' '<[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*-[a-zA-Z0-9-]*'
# Search for isCustomElement configurations that might conflict
ast-grep --pattern 'isCustomElement: $_'
Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for custom elements and configurations
# Search for any HTML-like tags with hyphens in Vue files
rg -g '*.vue' '<\w+[-]\w+' -l
# Search for custom element related configurations in all files
rg 'isCustomElement|customElement' -l
# Search for micro-app related imports or usage
rg 'micro-app' -l
# Look for Vue configuration files
fd -e js -e ts 'vue.config' -x cat {}
Length of output: 551
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the micro-app implementation details
# Check the content of micro-app-view.vue to understand custom element usage
cat packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/micro-app-view.vue
# Look at the micro-app related configuration and usage
cat packages/effects/layouts/src/micro/index.ts
cat playground/src/useMicro.ts
cat apps/web-antd/src/useChildMicro.ts
# Check if there are any other Vue compiler configurations that might conflict
ast-grep --pattern 'compilerOptions: {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 7597
apps/web-antd/src/bootstrap.ts (1)
22-28: Function handleMicroData is correctly implemented
The handleMicroData function appropriately checks for the micro-frontend environment and adds a data listener using window.microApp.addDataListener. The implementation aligns with micro-frontend data handling best practices.
| function unmount() { | ||
| app?.unmount(); | ||
| // history?.destroy(); | ||
| // 卸载所有数据监听函数,开启沙箱情况下不再需要 | ||
| window.microApp.clearDataListener(); | ||
|
|
||
| app = null; | ||
| // router = null; | ||
| // history = null; | ||
| console.warn('微应用卸载了,微应用的 unmount() fired'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add environment check before clearing data listeners
To prevent potential runtime errors when window.microApp is undefined outside of the micro-frontend environment, consider adding a check for window.__MICRO_APP_ENVIRONMENT__ before calling window.microApp.clearDataListener().
Apply the following change to ensure safe execution:
function unmount() {
app?.unmount();
// history?.destroy();
// 卸载所有数据监听函数,开启沙箱情况下不再需要
+ if (window.__MICRO_APP_ENVIRONMENT__) {
window.microApp.clearDataListener();
+ }
app = null;
// router = null;
// history = null;
console.warn('微应用卸载了,微应用的 unmount() fired');
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function unmount() { | |
| app?.unmount(); | |
| // history?.destroy(); | |
| // 卸载所有数据监听函数,开启沙箱情况下不再需要 | |
| window.microApp.clearDataListener(); | |
| app = null; | |
| // router = null; | |
| // history = null; | |
| console.warn('微应用卸载了,微应用的 unmount() fired'); | |
| } | |
| function unmount() { | |
| app?.unmount(); | |
| // history?.destroy(); | |
| // 卸载所有数据监听函数,开启沙箱情况下不再需要 | |
| if (window.__MICRO_APP_ENVIRONMENT__) { | |
| window.microApp.clearDataListener(); | |
| } | |
| app = null; | |
| // router = null; | |
| // history = null; | |
| console.warn('微应用卸载了,微应用的 unmount() fired'); | |
| } |
Description
This pull request includes multiple changes across various files in the
apps/web-antdproject. The most important changes involve configuration updates, micro-frontend integration, and layout adjustments.Configuration Updates:
apps/web-antd/.env: Added new environment variables forVITE_BASEandVITE_INJECT_APP_LOADING.apps/web-antd/.env.development: RemovedVITE_BASEandVITE_INJECT_APP_LOADINGvariables. [1] [2]apps/web-antd/.env.production: RemovedVITE_BASEandVITE_INJECT_APP_LOADINGvariables. [1] [2]Micro-Frontend Integration:
apps/web-antd/src/bootstrap.ts: Refactored the bootstrap process to support micro-frontend environments, including addinghandleMicroDataandunmountfunctions. [1] [2] [3]apps/web-antd/src/useChildMicro.ts: Added a new file to handle data interaction with the base application in a micro-frontend setup.Layout Adjustments:
apps/web-antd/src/layouts/index.ts: AddedLayoutUIandLayoutContentcomponents.apps/web-antd/src/router/access.ts: Updated to includeLayoutContentin the layout map. [1] [2]apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/dashboard.ts: Updated to useLayoutContentinstead ofBasicLayout.apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/demos.ts: Updated to useLayoutContentinstead ofBasicLayout.apps/web-antd/src/router/routes/modules/vben.ts: Updated to useLayoutContentinstead ofBasicLayout.Other Notable Changes:
apps/web-antd/index.html: Updated the app container ID and commented out production analytics script. [1] [2]apps/web-antd/package.json: Added@micro-zoe/micro-appdependency.internal/vite-config/src/plugins/index.ts: Added custom element handling formicro-apptags in the Vue template compiler options.These changes collectively enhance the project's configuration management, facilitate micro-frontend capabilities, and improve layout handling.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
LayoutUI,LayoutContent) and routes for micro-app integration.MicroAppViewcomponent for displaying micro-applications.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores