Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adms references #1570

Open
bertvannuffelen opened this issue May 16, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

adms references #1570

bertvannuffelen opened this issue May 16, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
dcat future-work issue deferred to the next standardization round

Comments

@bertvannuffelen
Copy link

Hi,

lately ADMS got a new release. The new release did not changed any semantics of the terms, but now there is content negotation on the namespace and the usage beyond DCAT of ADMS is made easier
By processing the DCAT specification, I spotted different usages how the ADMS terms are referenced. In brackets is the motivation for the change.

@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @bertvannuffelen,
PR #1572 implements your suggestions.
I've noticed the negotiation for the W3C served URIs (http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#xxx) brings to a non-W3C host.
May I ask what the development perspective for ADMS is in the future?

@bertvannuffelen
Copy link
Author

@riccardoAlbertoni
It is explained in this webinar https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/semic-support-centre/event/first-webinar-adms.
But in short, the future is

  • a joined collaboration between the SEMIC team and W3C for this vocabulary
  • no major changes are to be expected in the near future as the objectives are
    • to fresh up the specification ADMS to become a living specification with a community to address issues to
    • reduce the strong ties between ADMS and DCAT, so that ADMS terms can be used independently (current practice already, but that use was not according to the specification intentions.)

Unless the community raises new use-cases I expect that this version will be stable for a long period.

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

@bertvannuffelen , the version of ADMS considered by the WG when discussing the re-use of its properties / classes in DCAT3 is the one in W3C space.

Pointing to another document would require a thorough review of it by the WG.

BTW, as far as I can understand, ADMS 2.0, by decoupling ADMS from DCAT (as stated in https://semiceu.github.io/ADMS/releases/2.00/#motivation-for-this-version), cannot be considered equivalent to the version in W3C space.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dcat future-work issue deferred to the next standardization round
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants