Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

short-circuit drop Team-related votes #906

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tantek
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek commented Aug 9, 2024

This PR has the effect of subsetting the short-circuit vote to the elected+appointed members of the AB + TAG, which I believe is correct, as TimBL and the CEO (and other Team contacts if any) have likely already had the chance to contribute to the Team recommendation for the short-circuit.

This PR is based on discussion in #793, and generalized beyond just TimBL.

If we accept this PR then we can close #793 without any of the suggested changes therein, as this PR solves the problem that motivated #793 and does so in a more general and desirable manner.


Preview | Diff

This PR has the effect of subsetting the short-circuit vote to the elected+appointed members of the AB + TAG, which I believe is correct, as TimBL and the CEO (and other Team contacts if any) have likely already had the chance to contribute to the Team recommendation for the short-circuit.

This PR is based on discussion in w3c#793, and generalized beyond just TimBL.

If we accept this PR then we can close w3c#793 without any of the suggested changes therein, as this PR solves the problem that motivated w3c#793 and does so in a more general and desirable manner.
@hober
Copy link
Member

hober commented Aug 10, 2024

I still prefer #792, though I don't object to an additional change that removes the CEO from the short-circuit path.

@frivoal frivoal added the P2025 candidate To be addressed for Process 2025 (suggestion) label Oct 23, 2024
@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Oct 25, 2024

I would not object to this, but I don't find it particularly compelling either.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P2025 candidate To be addressed for Process 2025 (suggestion)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants