Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify the section Member Submissions #936

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Oct 23, 2024

Cuts down the Process part of Member Submissions to the bare minimum, with the expectation that all the detailed requirements and guidance will be shifted to /Guide.

Addresses #648, #421


Preview | Diff

Cuts down the Process part of Member Submissions to the bare minimum,
with the expectation that all the detailed requirements and guidance
will be shifted to /Guide.

Addresses w3c#648, w3c#421
@frivoal frivoal added Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call P2025 candidate To be addressed for Process 2025 (suggestion) labels Oct 23, 2024
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
One of the [=Submitters=],
copying the [=Advisory Committee representatives=] of the other [=Submitters=] (if any),
sends a request to the Team to acknowledge the Submission request.
The [=Team=] and [=Submitter=](s) communicate to ensure that the [=Member Submission=] is complete.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might call for an edit of the dfn to add the submitter(s) synonym.

Suggested change
The [=Team=] and [=Submitter=](s) communicate to ensure that the [=Member Submission=] is complete.
The [=Team=] and [=Submitter(s)=] communicate to ensure that the [=Member Submission=] is complete.

to evaluate whether it would be appropriate
and to ensure it complies with expectations:
to evaluate its scope, quality, and compliance with the Submission requirements,
including licensing requirements:

<ul>
<li>
The [=Submitter=](s)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this might also call for a document-wide search-and-replace. (Reason is that [=Submitter=](s) renders poorly; [=Submitter(s)=] renders better.)

Suggested change
The [=Submitter=](s)
The [=Submitter(s)=]


<li>If <dfn>rejected</dfn>,
<li>
If <dfn>rejected</dfn>,
the [=Team=] <em class=rfc2119>must</em> inform the [=Advisory Committee representative=](s) of the [=Submitter=](s),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[=Advisory Committee representative(s)=] synonym also needed.

Suggested change
the [=Team=] <em class=rfc2119>must</em> inform the [=Advisory Committee representative=](s) of the [=Submitter=](s),
the [=Team=] <em class=rfc2119>must</em> inform the [=Advisory Committee representative(s)=] of the [=Submitter(s)=],

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Filed speced/bikeshed#2948. If/when bikeshed addresses that, I'm happy to go along with your suggestion, but until then, that seems like too much work for not enough benefit.

index.bs Outdated
Comment on lines 5220 to 5221
and <em class=rfc2119>must</em> provide rationale if requested by the [=Submitter=](s).
The [=Submitter=](s) <em class=rfc2119>may</em> initiate a [=Submission Appeal=].
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
and <em class=rfc2119>must</em> provide rationale if requested by the [=Submitter=](s).
The [=Submitter=](s) <em class=rfc2119>may</em> initiate a [=Submission Appeal=].
and <em class=rfc2119>must</em> provide rationale if requested by the [=Submitter(s)=].
The [=Submitter(s)=] <em class=rfc2119>may</em> initiate a [=Submission Appeal=].

Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
@TallTed
Copy link
Member

TallTed commented Nov 13, 2024

I'm fine to merge this PR without my plural tweaks. A new issue on process or bikeshed or wherever makes sense to you would be welcomed.

@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion and removed Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call labels Nov 14, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2024/2025 milestone Nov 14, 2024
@frivoal frivoal merged commit 5a1c439 into w3c:main Nov 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@frivoal frivoal deleted the member-sub branch November 14, 2024 00:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion P2025 candidate To be addressed for Process 2025 (suggestion)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants