Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-111: Add informative definitions for 'Symmetric RDF'. #113

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

afs
Copy link
Contributor

@afs afs commented Nov 3, 2024

This closes: #111

Add informative terminology definitions for symmetric RDF where the subject position can be any RDF Term type that is allowed in the object position.


Preview | Diff

@afs afs added the spec:enhancement Issue or proposed change to enhance the spec without changing the normative content substantively label Nov 3, 2024
@afs afs self-assigned this Nov 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@gkellogg gkellogg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor change suggestion to allow blank nodes to name symmetric graphs in a symmetric dataset.

spec/index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
afs and others added 2 commits November 7, 2024 19:14
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
@afs afs merged commit cc47f33 into main Nov 7, 2024
2 checks passed
@afs afs deleted the symmetric branch November 7, 2024 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:enhancement Issue or proposed change to enhance the spec without changing the normative content substantively
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Symmetric RDF
6 participants