Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nixpkgs nomination proposal #17

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Jul 22, 2024

No description provided.

Without explanation it's not clear to me what this team actually does.
Hopefully this gives us a better idea.
@Mic92 Mic92 requested review from NickCao, jtojnar and a team as code owners July 22, 2024 07:53
@Mic92 Mic92 force-pushed the nixpkgs-nomination-proposal branch from 79164cd to 6630035 Compare July 22, 2024 08:12
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ There are many repositories, but these are some of the most important ones.

The Nix package collection and NixOS.

Currently there is an interim process for managing commit access, which is done by the Nixpkgs committer delegation team, whose processes are described [here](./nixpkgs-committers.md) and consists of these people:
Currently there is an interim process for managing commit access, which is done by the Nixpkgs committer admins, whose processes are described [here](./nixpkgs-committers.md) and consists of these people:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think github calls that role maintainers, so maybe "maintainer team"?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would be ideal if it would not clash with our maintainers in nixpkgs... We are running out of names.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants