feat: Implement bloom_filter_agg

[mbutrovich]

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #846.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

[alamb]

One way to avoid the copy, which may be too ugly , would be to store bloom filter data as an Option<>

So instead of

pub struct SparkBloomFilter {
    bits: SparkBitArray,
    num_hash_functions: u32,
}

Something like

pub struct SparkBloomFilter {
    bits: Option<SparkBitArray>
    num_hash_functions: u32,
}

And then you could basically use Option::take to take the value and leave a None in its place

let Some(bits) = self.bits.take() else {
  return Err(invalid state)
};

// do whatever you want now you have the owned `bits`

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.47059% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 34.41%. Comparing base (c3023c5) to head (bf22902).
Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../scala/org/apache/comet/serde/QueryPlanSerde.scala	76.47%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #987      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     34.03%   34.41%   +0.38%     
- Complexity      875      889      +14     
============================================
  Files           112      112              
  Lines         43289    43428     +139     
  Branches       9572     9627      +55     
============================================
+ Hits          14734    14947     +213     
+ Misses        25521    25437      -84     
- Partials       3034     3044      +10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.