CodeReviewComments: avoid using naked returns

[pellared]

Towards golang/go#21291

[gopherbot]

This PR (HEAD: bbc1758) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit Gerrit at https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/wiki/+/621915.

Important tips:

• Don't comment on this PR. All discussion takes place in Gerrit.
• You need a Gmail or other Google account to log in to Gerrit.
• To change your code in response to feedback:
  • Push a new commit to the branch used by your GitHub PR.
  • A new "patch set" will then appear in Gerrit.
  • Respond to each comment by marking as Done in Gerrit if implemented as suggested. You can alternatively write a reply.
  • Critical: you must click the blue Reply button near the top to publish your Gerrit responses.
  • Multiple commits in the PR will be squashed by GerritBot.
• The title and description of the GitHub PR are used to construct the final commit message.
  • Edit these as needed via the GitHub web interface (not via Gerrit or git).
  • You should word wrap the PR description at ~76 characters unless you need longer lines (e.g., for tables or URLs).
• See the Sending a change via GitHub and Reviews sections of the Contribution Guide as well as the FAQ for details.

[pellared]

Is there any good reason to use naked returns?
If not, then I think it is better to recommend avoiding them (always).

Naked returns are okay if the function is a handful of lines.

This feels very subjective. How many is handful? Is "okay" just "acceptable" or actually "good"?

By @ianlancetaylor himself:

I understand that people don't like bare returns--I'm not especially fond of them myself

Partially addresses:

• proposal: Go 2: remove bare return go#21291

References:

• https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/15rz5if/do_you_use_or_avoid_named_results/
• https://boldlygo.tech/archive/2024-08-02-naked-returns
• https://levelup.gitconnected.com/go-naked-returns-4e2094b598e6

[gopherbot]

Message from Gopher Robot:

Patch Set 1:

(1 comment)

---

Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/621915.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

[gopherbot]

Message from Gopher Robot:

Patch Set 1:

Congratulations on opening your first change. Thank you for your contribution!

Next steps:
A maintainer will review your change and provide feedback. See
https://go.dev/doc/contribute#review for more info and tips to get your
patch through code review.

Most changes in the Go project go through a few rounds of revision. This can be
surprising to people new to the project. The careful, iterative review process
is our way of helping mentor contributors and ensuring that their contributions
have a lasting impact.

---

Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/621915.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!